RE: RE: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email

to Heaven says a lot about anticipated traffic volume. >-Original Message- >From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Stephen >Satchell >Sent: Tuesday, 20 March, 2018 19:39 >To: nanog@nanog.org >Subject: Fwd: RE: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy

Fwd: RE: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email

ver farm. We had some, er, "interesting" denial of service attacks that didn't do as much damage as they could have. Forwarded Message Subject: RE: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 17:15:25 + From: Charles Bronson

Managing ARP traffic [ was Re: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email ]

On Tue 2018-Mar-20 17:15:25 +, Charles Bronson wrote: If this isn't pertinent to the list, feel free to answer privately. How did you implement the server that got rid of ARP storms? Perhaps something like an ARP sponge?

RE: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email

To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: [EXT] Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email Two DNS servers hosted on one box (or VM object), even with two addresses, is easily compromised by DDoS amplification attacks. That's the norm for a number of "web control panel" systems like Plesk

Fwd: Re: problems sending to prodigy.net hosted email

Two DNS servers hosted on one box (or VM object), even with two addresses, is easily compromised by DDoS amplification attacks. That's the norm for a number of "web control panel" systems like Plesk and CPanel. It depends on the scale of your operations. Last time I was in that situation, I