Most of the SOHO router vendors (Netgear, Linksys, etc) have a model
targeted at this application. When this class of dual homed router
first came out several years ago, they were notoriously unreliable, but
I would hope they work better by now. A search on the term ping based
routing should give
Hi Paul
You can do this on a linux box with a pretty much basic kernel.
I currently have a similar setup at home with a DSL and a cable line (from
different providers).
Here's the script I'm actually using: http://ocaholic.ch/download/multinat.txt
Some packets are tagged with iptables (SSH as
--- paul.w.benn...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Paul Bennett paul.w.benn...@gmail.com
At home, I currently run two DSL lines. Right now, we just have two
separate LANs, one connected to each line, with my wife's devices attached
to one, and my devices attached to the other. For a while now, I've
You would need at least one router for this.
Personally I would connect both DSL modems into a small Cisco router or
multi-layer switch. Use that router as the default gateways for each LAN
and have two static routes as the default gateway on the router to
specify each DSL line. This would allow
Do you control or have access to the provider side-the PPPoE server-and would
both PPPoE connections hit the same PPPoE server at the provider? If so, I
recommend setting up a PPP multilink with both DSL lines. The DSL provider
would have to support that capability. I also recommend something
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Paul Bennett wrote:
Not sure whether this is an appropriate place to post this, but I thought I'd
give it a shot, since you're all knowledgeable folks with regard to
networking things...
At home, I currently run two DSL lines. Right now, we just have two
Paul Bennett wrote:
At home, I currently run two DSL lines. Right now, we just have two
separate LANs, one connected to each line, with my wife's devices
attached to one, and my devices attached to the other. For a while now,
I've been thinking about setting up a load-balancing routing
2x DSL not so backhoe-resistant.
I like mixing cable with dsl. Tasty disparate paths (modulo garden shears
applied to the single ingres point to your basement) if not technologies, orgs
and methodologies. Or radio + dsl, or pigeon + mule, take your pick.
Would be great if you could rate your
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Ken Chase m...@sizone.org wrote:
2x DSL not so backhoe-resistant.
I like mixing cable with dsl. Tasty disparate paths (modulo garden shears
applied to the single ingres point to your basement) if not technologies,
orgs
and methodologies. Or radio + dsl, or
I use a T1/26xx for primary and a sprint datacard in a little NAT router for
secondary. The two boxes sit on the same LAN but provide different gateway
IP addresses. The sprint router does the DHCP, so things that ask for DHCP
wind up using that as the primary. Some boxes use the 26xx as
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Paul Bennett wrote:
Is it going to be a more-effective solution to drop a few bucks on the 2960
and go through the hassle of learning how to set it up (and then setting it
up), or would I be better off putting a secured Linux distro (e.g.
gentoo-hardened, or
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Dec 30, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Paul Bennett wrote:
Is it going to be a more-effective solution to drop a few bucks on the
2960 and go through the hassle of learning how to set it up (and then
setting it up), or would
At home, I currently run two DSL lines. Right now, we just have two
separate LANs, one connected to each line, with my wife's devices attached
to one, and my devices attached to the other. For a while now, I've been
thinking about setting up a load-balancing routing solution to give both
of
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
Back at the Toronto NANOG I bumped into someone who had an interesting
solution to the multihoming problem.
What they had was a machine that would key/sequence the packets and send
them out each connection
On Dec 30, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
I guess that method presume some cooperating box out there on the net
somewhere to coordinate the far end?
Yes. This allowed the provider to use a variety of different technologies to
reach a site, eg: IP over CATV, DSL, Fiber, Wireless,
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13:24AM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I know nothing of how to do this on a Catalyst; for PCs, my own guess
is that you're looking far too high-end. If the issue is relaying to
the outside, I suspect that a small, dedicated Soekris or the like
will do all you need
Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13:24AM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I know nothing of how to do this on a Catalyst; for PCs, my own guess
is that you're looking far too high-end. If the issue is relaying to
the outside, I suspect that a small, dedicated Soekris or
On Dec 30, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Brett Frankenberger wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:13:24AM -0500, Steven Bellovin wrote:
I know nothing of how to do this on a Catalyst; for PCs, my own guess
is that you're looking far too high-end. If the issue is relaying to
the
18 matches
Mail list logo
