Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
On 2017-08-13 10:05, Ca By wrote: On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM Dovid Benderwrote: It seems that his emails are accomplishing something! http://bgp.he.net/AS202746 Name and shame does work sometimes IMO, this works better than most name-and-shame efforts because the behavior being called out is fairly universally indefensible. I think we can all agree to hate prefix hijackers (when we all pay for our IP assets) and spammers (because they cause most of us varying levels of grief), whereas "I personally don't like $x" (e.g., slow IPv6/BCP adoption) is often met with "I don't care about this, so fooey on your initiative." There may be a pointed statement in there -- thanks. ;-) Jima
Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 8:53 AM Dovid Benderwrote: > It seems that his emails are accomplishing something! > > http://bgp.he.net/AS202746 > Name and shame does work sometimes The tier 1s like Telia need to be the “grownups” and not let hijacks invade the DFZ CB > > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger < > sebast...@karotte.org> > wrote: > > > * Ronald F. Guilmette [2017-08-02 09:37]: > > > > > > The annotations in the RIPE WHOIS record for AS202746 seem pretty clear > > to me. > > > This thing is B-O-G-U-S! > > > > You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you > > express your points in a less emotional and aggressive tone. > > > > Regards > > > > > > Sebastian > > > > -- > > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > > SCYTHE. > > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant > > >
Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
It seems that his emails are accomplishing something! http://bgp.he.net/AS202746 On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Sebastian Wiesingerwrote: > * Ronald F. Guilmette [2017-08-02 09:37]: > > > > The annotations in the RIPE WHOIS record for AS202746 seem pretty clear > to me. > > This thing is B-O-G-U-S! > > You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you > express your points in a less emotional and aggressive tone. > > Regards > > > Sebastian > > -- > GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) > 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE > SCYTHE. > -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant >
Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:51:43PM +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote: > You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you > express your points in a less emotional and aggressive tone. You know, lots of us tried that for the first ten or twenty years. But snark aside, I care a lot more about the actionable intelligence being provided than the manner of its presentation. Ron has been doing valuable, useful research for years and has been kind enough to share the results with us. For free. I'm grateful for that. ---rsk
Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
* Ronald F. Guilmette[2017-08-02 09:37]: > > The annotations in the RIPE WHOIS record for AS202746 seem pretty clear to me. > This thing is B-O-G-U-S! You know, people might be more willing to listen to you when you express your points in a less emotional and aggressive tone. Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
Re: AS202746 Hijacks: Is Telia (a) stupid, or (b) lazy, or (c) complicit?
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:36 AM, Ronald F. Guilmettewrote: > > > P.S. Over on some of the RIPE mailing lists, they've recently been > discussing > whether or not to continue allowing Joe Random Criminal to create totally > unauthorized and totally unchecked/unverified (and typically bogus) route > objects in the RIPE data base for so-called "out of region" IP address > block > resources. Of course, if anybody had any brains or any backbone over on > that > side of the pond, they would have done this already ten years ago. But > such > is the pace of change in the Old World, where even the most obvious things > can't be implemented until everybody and his brother agrees, including even > the stupid kid. > There are/were providers which required RIPE-IRR registration to accept routes, I don't know that this is still the case, but it might account for unwillingness to remove 'out of region' content. As well, there are folk with space from more than just one RIR, who may have chosen (for a myriad of resaons) to centralize their IRR content on a single IRR. Sometimes your message is lost in the emotive editorializing :(