Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too)

2017-12-28 Thread Owen DeLong
un...@nanog.org> en nombre de Octavio Alvarez > <octalna...@alvarezp.org> > Responder a: <octalna...@alvarezp.org> > Fecha: jueves, 28 de diciembre de 2017, 19:31 > Para: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> > CC: <nanog@nanog.org> > Asunto: Re: Assigning /64 but using

Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too)

2017-12-28 Thread JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
e 2017, 19:31 Para: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> CC: <nanog@nanog.org> Asunto: Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too) On 12/28/2017 11:39 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Dec 28, 2017, at 09:23 , Octavio Alvarez <octalna...@alvarezp.org&

Re: Assigning /64 but using /127 (was Re: Waste will kill ipv6 too)

2017-12-28 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On 12/28/2017 11:39 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Dec 28, 2017, at 09:23 , Octavio Alvarez wrote: >> >> On 12/20/2017 12:23 PM, Mike wrote: >>> On 12/17/2017 08:31 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote: >>> Call this the 'shavings', in IPv4 for example, when you assign a P2P >>> link