I found Migrating to IPv6: A practical guide to implementing IPv6 in
mobile and fixed networks by Marc Blanchet very well written and
worth the price of admission.
ISBN: 978-0471-49892-6
--
Brad Fleming
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
Can anyone recommend a decent book
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update
I found Migrating to IPv6: A practical guide to implementing IPv6 in
mobile and fixed networks by Marc Blanchet very well written and
worth the price of admission.
ISBN: 978-0471-49892-6
--
Brad Fleming
On Mar 1, 2010, at 8:21 AM, Curtis Maurand wrote
://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/ipv6/configuration/guide/12_4/ipv6_1
2_4_book.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Brzozowski, John [mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com]
Sent: 01 March 2010 14:37
To: bdflem...@kanren.net; cmaur...@xyonet.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
- Original Message -
From: Curtis Maurand cmaur...@xyonet.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:21 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update
Can anyone recommend a decent book on IPV6? Most of what I find on the
net don't explain things very well.
thanks,
Curtis
Mike,
Are you looking for something specific on www.comcast6.net? We will likely
be making some content updates in the not too distant future and over time
as the trials progress and evolve. If there is something specific you would
like to see send me your suggestions.
Thanks,
John
On
Wow that's great, hopefully Cablevision will do the same with their optimum
online!!!
From: mich...@thegrebs.com
Subject: Fwd: Comcast IPv6 Trials Update
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:15:45 -0500
To: nanog@nanog.org
Received this message today. They haven't updated the
-
From: William McCall
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without
going too far, what was the driving factor/selling point to moving
towards this trial?
SWAG: Comcast is a mobile
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 17:50:22 EST, Steven Bellovin said:
In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants
based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through
channels other than the usual Tier 1 support?
Two comments:
1) People who manage to find out about
John Jason Brzozowski wrote:
Folks,
I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find
interesting.
Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans. For more information
please visit the following web site:
I was privileged enough to visit the Comcast DOCSIS3/IPv6
ober...@es.net wrote:
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
-Original Message-
From: William McCall
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption
:
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
-Original Message-
From: William McCall
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without
going too far, what
28, 2010 7:47 AM
To: Kevin Oberman
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
What I've heard is that the driver is IPv4 exhaustion: Comcast is
starting to have enough subscribers that it can't address them all out
of 10/8 -- ~millions of subscribers, each with 1 IP address (e.g.,
for user
-Original Message-
From: Richard Barnes [mailto:richard.bar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 07:47
To: Kevin Oberman
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
What I've heard is that the driver is IPv4 exhaustion: Comcast is
starting to have enough
-94.html
http://unbelievablyfair.com/
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: George Bonser [mailto:gbon...@seven.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 1:56 AM
To: Kevin Oberman
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Comcast IPv6 Trials
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oberman
* Paul Stewart (pstew...@nexicomgroup.net) wrote:
That really makes sense - on an incredibly smaller scale (and I mean MUCH
smaller scale), we operate cable modem in two small communities - currently
we use 3 IP addresses per subscriber. One for the cable modem itself, one
for the
-Original Message-
From: tv...@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tv...@eyeconomics.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
SNIP
But then that begs the question of why lots of other very large retail
Internet access providers
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:07 AM, TJ wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tv...@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tv...@eyeconomics.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
SNIP
But then that begs the question of why lots of other
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Joakim Aronius joa...@aronius.com wrote:
Excuse the newbie question: Why use public IP space for local CPE management
and VoIP? Doesn't DOCSIS support traffic separation?
/J
Probably because rfc1918 is only 2^24+2^20+2^16 = 17,891,328
(assuming I got them
steve pirk: Does G4 count? I have seen fliers from Comcast talking
about mobile G4
Comcast is using Clearwire for 4G. Seattle 4G rolled-out about 2
weeks ago. Many more markets to be turned-up this spring. No IPv6 in
the configs at this time, but most of the core seems capable. Clear
is
From: tv...@eyeconomics.com
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:34:52 -0500
On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:07 AM, TJ wrote:
-Original Message-
From: tv...@eyeconomics.com [mailto:tv...@eyeconomics.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 08:12
To: Richard Barnes
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: Comcast
Typically the CPE address is private, not sure why they would use a
public IP. The MTA (VoIP) part of the modem would need a public IP if
it was talking to a SIP server that was not on the same network. Most
smaller cable system outsource their VoIP to a reseller with a softswitch.
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Chris Gotstein ch...@uplogon.com wrote:
Typically the CPE address is private, not sure why they would use a
public IP. The MTA (VoIP) part of the modem would need a public IP if
it was talking to a SIP server that was not on the same network. Most
smaller
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:23, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Folks,
I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find
interesting.
Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans. For more information
please visit the following web
There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place.
Do you have any form of IPv6 connectivity? If yes, this is why you are
seeing the same portal. This will clear up shortly.
John
On 1/27/10 3:47 PM, Bill Fehring li...@billfehring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place.
Great, got it working, thanks! ...partially Safari/OSX's fault, but
mostly mine for not realizing what was going on quickly enough.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:23 AM, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Folks,
I am emailing you today to share some news that we hope you will find
interesting.
Today we are announcing our 2010 IPv6 trial plans. For more information
please visit the following web
Wonderful!
In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants based
on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through channels other than
the usual Tier 1 support?
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.eduwrote:
Wonderful!
In all seriousness, will any attempt be made to select trial applicants
based on (apparent) clue level and/or to receive feedback through channels
other than the usual Tier 1 support?
From
Thanks.
Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target trial subscribers
with greater IPv6 awareness. The technical team will absolutely remain
engaged as part of the support process.
HTH,
John
On 1/27/10 5:50 PM, Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu wrote:
Wonderful!
In all
On 1/27/10 5:00 PM, Bill Fehring li...@billfehring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place.
Great, got it working, thanks! ...partially Safari/OSX's fault,
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without
going too far, what was the driving factor/selling point to moving
towards this trial?
--
William McCall
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:23 PM, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
Folks,
I am emailing
-Original Message-
From: William McCall
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without
going too far, what was the driving factor/selling point to moving
towards this trial?
SWAG
- Original Message -
From: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
To: Steven Bellovin s...@cs.columbia.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Thanks.
Initially it would be ideal (even preferred) to target
On 1/27/2010 15:19, John Jason Brzozowski wrote:
On 1/27/10 5:00 PM, Bill Fehring li...@billfehring.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:52, John Jason Brzozowski
john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
There was an adjustment that was required on our end. It is in place.
Great, got it
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:59:16 -0800
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
-Original Message-
From: William McCall
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 7:51 PM
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
Saw this today too. This is a good step forward for adoption. Without
going too
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Oberman [mailto:ober...@es.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 9:56 PM
To: George Bonser
Cc: William McCall; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Comcast IPv6 Trials
SWAG is wrong. Comcast is a major cable TV, telephone (VoIP), and
Internet provider
36 matches
Mail list logo
