Yeah my test points VM's where all FreeBSD 10.3/11.0, so I decided
to randomize some of them and added a CentOS on my Telia peer (10Gbps),
and start getting normal performance from GCLD ( In the 500Mbps/500Mbps
PS: Even weirderer(tm) The *BSD VMs always
Just did a quick test from a personal VM, no throughput difference over
direct peering, public IX, or transit. GCP might have a bottleneck in your
case though, might be a good idea to ask them.
Also, I'll have what Gordon is having.
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Gordon Cook
Hi Alain and all the rest
I het it now
no offense and alain no harm done and all of nanog thank you and i will
continue observing as i have since 1995
thank you allagin
PS and BTW i am interested in CLOUD
thanks once more
> On Jun 19, 2017, at 9:36 AM, Alain Hebert
Yes Stephen, we're talking the usual like GTT...
And no latency wise they're about the same. In the 35ms range.
But I still can't figure out the 10 x drop, that level of latency
alone cannot be the factor.
( And Gordy... what?!? )
please accept my apologies this response was totally out of context
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 9:25 PM, Gordon Cook wrote:
> i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell
> but with valerie home any minute i must stop
> will come back though
>> On Jun 16,
i also see now that you are a guru rinpoche as wlell
but with valerie home any minute i must stop
will come back though
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 7:42 PM, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are
When you refer to "normal peering" do you mean Internet transit? Or are
these PNI's with Google? Do the GCLD instance you reach through "normal
peering" have higher latency than through TorIX?
On 2017-06-16 6:58 PM, Alain Hebert wrote:
Anyone aware of
Mail list logo