On 7/31/2014 12:07 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
1. The article mentioned DHCP doesn't do the other part of what PPPoE or
PPPoA does, which is generate RADIUS accounting records that give us the
bandwidth information. So that’s one of the main challenges in switching to
a DHCP based system. So, how
What is the ideal way to aggregate the 40 10G connections from the uplinks
of the chassis? I would guess a 10G switch since 10G ports on a router
would be much more expensive?
Definitely aggregate into a switch first unless you want to run a Layer 3
switch as your router, which I don't recommend.
Scott,
Thanks for the long post.
We will use a layer 2 10G aggregation switch then to aggregate the chassis
at the core location. Do you have any recommendations on 10G switches?
Yes I realize the math is a little backwards as this is all hypothetical at
this point. We would provision each ONT
On Jul 31, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Is a firewall needed in the core?
No, quite the opposite:
https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl
How would you build a access network from the ground up if you had the
resources and time to do so?
I'd hire folks
Roland,
I agree with everything you mentioned in your email. No matter how much
money and resources you have, if you don't have the talent and people
required to get the job done the project will fail. There a many outfits,
like Scotts for example, that will handle most all of these issues for an
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 9:23 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
If a new operator or city is building a greenfield access network from the
ground up,
Hi Colton,
We just had a long discussion in this forum to the effect that if a
city builds a greenfield access network, it would be
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
Scott,
Thanks for the long post.
We will use a layer 2 10G aggregation switch then to aggregate the chassis
at the core location. Do you have any recommendations on 10G switches?
Not really, just stick with one
I have read both the Juniper MX and Cisco ASR9K do support this advanced
BRAS functionality, what Juniper calls Subscriber Feature Management and
what Cisco calls BGN. These software functions run on the router itself,
however the are not free or included with the base chassis. To enable these
you
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have read both the Juniper MX and Cisco ASR9K do support this advanced
BRAS functionality, what Juniper calls Subscriber Feature Management and
what Cisco calls BGN. These software functions run on the router itself,
Scott,
Thank you for your input.
What do you recommend for network segmentation? A VLAN per Chassis, a VLAN
per service, or a VLAN per customer/port? When you say qinq VLANs are you
referring to the CVLAN model?
I am really interested to know how the largest providers, like Comcast,
ATT, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
