Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

NANOG en nombre de Max Tulyev Fecha: domingo, 10 de febrero de 2019, 19:21 Para: NANOG Asunto: Re: IPv6 and forensic requests Great, thank you! Did you manage to whitelist APN at Apple so iOS devices can use it too? 10.02.19 20:06, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ пише: > Well, if

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

meeting, APNIC meeting, etc., there are even videos of them). Regards, Jordi -Mensaje original- De: NANOG en nombre de Max Tulyev Fecha: domingo, 10 de febrero de 2019, 16:30 CC: NANOG Asunto: Re: IPv6 and forensic requests Hello Jordi, thank you, I will take

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

Max Tulyev Fecha: domingo, 10 de febrero de 2019, 16:30 CC: NANOG Asunto: Re: IPv6 and forensic requests Hello Jordi, thank you, I will take a look on Jool! Exactly CLAT was the issue. First, I thought to provide a /128 to every mobile, and then do a static

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

You want this to log the bindings through the nat64 https://www.jool.mx/en/usr-flags-global.html#logging-bib Then you cross reference that with the /64 that is assigned to the UE in the CDR When doing lookups of this data, only look at the first 64 bits. That is all that matters and is unique

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

Hello Jordi, thank you, I will take a look on Jool! Exactly CLAT was the issue. First, I thought to provide a /128 to every mobile, and then do a static 6to4 to certain public IPv4. But it seems mobile need a /64, and it uses a lot of random IPv6 inside assigned /64, several addresses

Re: IPv6 and forensic requests

Do you really mean 6to4 or NAT64? Totally different things ... If that's the case, I will suggest you go for Jool instead of Tayga. Also, if you want the customers are able to use old IPv4 apps and devices, NAT64 is not sufficient, you need also CLAT at the customer premises (so they can run