On 10/7/21 16:33, Nick Hilliard wrote:
there was more to it than that. The grammar was too complicated to
easily describe common policies and too limited to describe complex
policies. The structure was difficult to extend when the routing
became more complicated (e.g. mpls, route
Randy Bush wrote on 07/10/2021 15:26:
it was sabatoged
there was more to it than that. The grammar was too complicated to
easily describe common policies and too limited to describe complex
policies. The structure was difficult to extend when the routing became
more complicated (e.g.
>> i was hoping that, if 3130 said it is peering with martha, artemis
>> would get a clue and stfu
>
> right. This was klunked around using the export-via and import-via
> rpsl constructions (draft-snijders-rpsl-via), which never quite made
> it to ietf wg adoption status. It did, however, point
Randy Bush wrote on 04/10/2021 21:15:
i was hoping that, if 3130 said it is peering with martha, artemis would
get a clue and stfu
right. This was klunked around using the export-via and import-via rpsl
constructions (draft-snijders-rpsl-via), which never quite made it to
ietf wg adoption
On 10/5/21 09:29, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
…like a, say, „single pane of glass”? ;)
Oh dear Lord :-)...
Mark.
…like a, say, „single pane of glass”? ;)
--
./
> On 5 Oct 2021, at 06:25, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 10/4/21 21:55, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>>
>> Nearly 30 years on, this is still the state of the art.
>
> Not an unlike an NMS... still can't walk into a shop and just buy one that
>
On 10/4/21 21:55, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Nearly 30 years on, this is still the state of the art.
Not an unlike an NMS... still can't walk into a shop and just buy one
that works out of the box :-).
Mark.
>> a SIX peer's customer could be the feed to RIS
> Sure, but how do you describe the policy between your peer and their
> customer in your aut-num?! That's not a thing.
yup
these rat holes are a pita
randy
Hi Randy,
On 10/04, Randy Bush wrote:
> hi ben,
>
> a SIX peer's customer could be the feed to RIS
>
Sure, but how do you describe the policy between your peer and their
customer in your aut-num?! That's not a thing.
Cheers,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hi ben,
a SIX peer's customer could be the feed to RIS
randy
Hi Randy,
On 10/04, Randy Bush wrote:
> so i have an AS (3130) which peers at the SIX (RSs and some direct).
>
> in the hope that leak detectors such as artemis would stop false
> positives when they see my prefixes announced customer cones of SIX
> peers, i want to add the SIX peers to my
>> what are others in this space doing?
>
> not using import/export lines in their RS or router configs, for
> starters. Probably you could count the number of IXPs that inspect
> import/export lines on the fingers of one hand, and possibly of one
> finger.
>
> Generally speaking, IXPs try to
Some IX'es set communities telling which member announced that prefix;
if SIX is one of those, that can be used to automate origin
verification.
Rubens
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 2:08 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> so i have an AS (3130) which peers at the SIX (RSs and some direct).
>
> in the hope that
Randy Bush wrote on 04/10/2021 17:44:
what are others in this space doing?
not using import/export lines in their RS or router configs, for
starters. Probably you could count the number of IXPs that inspect
import/export lines on the fingers of one hand, and possibly of one finger.
14 matches
Mail list logo
