On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 11:26:51AM -0500, Rob McEwen wrote:
> Is DDoS-Guard without blame? Probably not, but them hosting some occasional
> criminals is NOT UNLIKE EVERY OTHER GLOBAL NETWORK!
You might wish to scroll back up to the message I sent here on January 21
with the Subject "DDOS-Guard"
On 1/25/2021 11:34 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
They are not losing IPs because of hosting questionable content.
Correct - but from reading the Brian Krebs article on this, that was the
justification that Ron Guilmette used for going after Parler and DDoS-Guard.
--
Rob McEwen
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 1:28 PM Rob McEwen wrote:
>
> A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you checked the
> children?" becomes "have you checked the IP registration?"
>
> [image: Have you checked the IP registration?]
>
>
> The vast majority of the time, Ron Guilmette does
/(sent again since the last one had the inline graphic stripped out - so
this one links to the graphic on a website)/
A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you checked the
children?" becomes "have you checked the IP registration?"
Have you checked the IP registration?
A take on the 1979 movie "When A Stranger Calls" - "have you checked the
children?" becomes "have you checked the IP registration?"
Have you checked the IP registration?
The vast majority of the time, Ron Guilmette does "the Lord's work" -
but THIS time - it looks to me like he put his
Hi Matthew,
I’m not sure I’ve succeded to explain it in previous emails.
The requirement for the LACNIC policies about majority of usage *in the region*
of the resources provided has been there for many years. I’m almost sure than
since day 1, but will need to dig into older versions of the
On 1/24/21 3:15 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
Hi Jordi,
I've adjusted the subject line to reflect the real thrust of this
discussion.
[edits Message Filters to include string "Past policies versus present
and future uses" in Subject]
[selects folder "NANOG" in Thunderbird: All Folders]
7 matches
Mail list logo