On 2 Sep 2010, at 8:20 PM, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number of
routers) out there?
I have seen (as a consultant, not operator) a production SP network that had
over 800 routers in the backbone area. The LSDB was rather small as the
On Sep 2, 2010, at 11:11 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of
number of
routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
Of course I do -- 'tis much for
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number of
routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
Nick
Subject: Re: largest OSPF core
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of
routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit to something like this? :-)
For giggles:
http://books.google.com/books?id
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:12:38 EDT, Deepak Jain said:
Dual routing is intended to be more of a long-term solution because there
will be very few pure OSI or TCP/IP routing environments in the future.
Well, they were half-right. ;)
pgpjIdWlsKA38.pgp
Description: PGP signature
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of routers) out there?
I'll admit to having seen a network with over 400 devices in an
OSPF area 0, didn't design it, and in the end didn't
I think it is really depending on how your network topology looks like.
If you have top-down design with star topology to limit the network
connections to individual routers, it may scale well.
But if you connect every routers to each other such as full-mesh, it
will be a problem during interface
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of routers) out there?
The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it wouldn't
surprise me if a OSPF network largely
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:42 AM, Deepak Jain dee...@ai.net wrote:
Subject: Re: largest OSPF core
On 02/09/2010 13:20, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of
routers) out there?
You don't expect anyone to actually admit
.
With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
implementations?
You left out the option of using ospf3 to do both v4 and v6. Works
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:32:30PM -0400, Deepak Jain wrote:
With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
implementations?
You
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:20:05 +0300
lorddoskias lorddosk...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of routers) out there?
Presuming OSPF and IS-IS SPF costs are fairly similar, the following
page from The complete IS-IS routing protocol
The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it
wouldn't surprise me if a OSPF network largely comprised of router
LSAs (no redistribution), using today's hardware, could easily scale
to 1000 nodes in an area.
i believe the original poster asked about actual operating
On Sep 2, 2010, at 7:35 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
The stability of the topology plays a most prominent role, but it
wouldn't surprise me if a OSPF network largely comprised of router
LSAs (no redistribution), using today's hardware, could easily scale
to 1000 nodes in an area.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org wrote:
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 03:20:05PM +0300, lorddoskias
wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number
of routers) out there?
I'll admit to having seen a network with over
In a message written on Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 09:40:39PM -0400, Christian Martin
wrote:
The most interesting point to make, however, is how much legacy
thinking in this area continues to be stranded in a rut that emerged
15 years ago. It is not uncommon to hear network folks cringe at
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
