Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-23 Thread Alain Hebert
    Hi,     Back last year, I experienced less than expected reliability with QFX and their QSFPs.     We prefer to use optic.ca since they're a few minutes from our DC's and will respond within the day, with platform and firmware changes, which we can test in lab before shipping to our

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Nikolas Geyer
Another vote for Approved here, awesome group of people and very thorough in their testing and fault analysis. We buy from them for Juniper, Ciena, Mellanox, Intel and a bunch of other random stuff. I’ve had mixed results with FS. Some stuff works fine, others we have high failure rates on

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Neil Hanlon
I've got a whole bunch running with no issues.. Mostly MM/850nm though, so maybe a bit different than their SM stuff. Also have a handful (literally) of the SM ones, and haven't had any issues (yet). Only "problem" I've had is a copper SFP from them which may have burned out and fried a

RE: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Michel Py
> Nicholas Warren wrote : > Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? I have a few hundreds of them, started buying from them about 3 years ago, not a single issue so far. I'm going to buy their box soon, so I could recode a Cisco optic into an HP one, easier on spares

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Carl Peterson
We have had some failures with 10G BiDi optics coded for Juniper. We buy a ton of other stuff from FS but for optics we have moved over to Approved Optics for everything but active ethernet residential subscribers. On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 7:33 AM Nicholas Warren wrote: > Anyone have experience

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Matthew Crocker
I have had some fail and SFP+ & QSFP28s that my Juniper MC480s refuse to recognize even though I ordered 'branded Juniper' optics. 99% of my stuff is from FlexOptix (https://www.flexoptix.net/). They are a bit more expensive but I've had 100% reliability and they have worked in all systems

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Brandon Martin
On 9/20/19 10:43 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: > We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300 > parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily > refuses to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and > some oem salespeople

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Mel Beckman
We buy them extensively and have had zero data problems with more than 300 parts in the field. Some switch/router manufacturers’ firmware poutily refuses to let you read snmp stats from any “unauthorized” SFPs modules, and some oem salespeople lyingly claim that using them voids your warranty,

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Dennis Lundström
Had some issues in the past with Juniper-coded LR4 with sporadic disconnections. Apart from those I don’t have any complaints beyond the odd DOA. —Dennis On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 08:32 Nicholas Warren wrote: > Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? >

RE: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Chris Gross
Biggest issue I've seen is it may work on some Cisco models and not others. I got their flashing box to just reflash the firmware and that has fixed even "dead" optics. -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Nicholas Warren Sent: Friday, September 20, 2019 8:32 AM To:

RE: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Kevin McCormick
Yes. I never have seen a failure in the last few years. We have used Cisco compatible 1G / 10G DAC, SR, LR, and DWDM. Buy spares if you are concerned, they are priced so you can. We do like having spares in a rack drawer. Thank you, Kevin McCormick -Original Message- From: NANOG On

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Jason Lixfeld
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Bryan Holloway wrote: > > In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --, > but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it > can be a "successful" business model. > For someone who doesn't want to deal

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Bryan Holloway
It boils down to a business case. In my travels we see a high failure rate -- higher than I'd like to see --, but $boss likes the price, and, as Jason pointed out below, for the price, it can be a "successful" business model. In a nutshell: For someone on a budget, they're great; buy

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Jason Lixfeld
We have maybe 1:50 DOA, but they’re so cheap, we just throw them out because it’s not worth the RMA. That said, I can’t remember the last time we’ve had any of these fail in the field, or have had any issues with variablity in TX/RX power. We have tens of thousands of these in the field, from

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Bryan Holloway
On 9/20/19 2:31 PM, Nicholas Warren wrote: Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? YMMV.

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Brandon Martin
On 9/20/19 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren wrote: Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? I've had no complaints about reliability. In terms of transmit power and receiver performance, they seem to have a bit more variability than some of the bigger brands' offerings, but

Re: sfps from fs dot com

2019-09-20 Thread Jared Mauch
> On Sep 20, 2019, at 8:31 AM, Nicholas Warren > wrote: > > Anyone have experience with fs.com's lasers? Are they reliable? Yes.