The BGP Visibility Scanner now for IPv6 prefixes

2013-08-09 Thread Andra Lutu

Dear all,

In November 2012 we have released the *BGP Visibility Scanner*, a tool 
that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the interdomain level.
We are now happy to further make available the *visibility query for 
IPv6 prefixes*.


Back in February 2013 we have presented the BGP Visibility Scanner at 
NANOG57.
Please find the abstract and slides at the following link: 
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=2072

The tool is publicly available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/*
You can use it to retrieve prefixes injected by a certain origin AS that 
are not distributed everywhere (i.e., the Limited Visibility Prefixes).

The tool has already been proven to be of real help to network operators.
In particular, it helped identify and eliminate a large number of 
unintended IPv4 LVPs (e.g., prefixes leaked because of misconfigurations).


We believe the tool is of interest for the ASes already deploying IPv6, 
enabling the operators to check the visibility status of their IPv6 
prefixes and validate their routing policies. We would greatly 
appreciate your feedback on the limited visibility prefixes that you 
discover with the tool!


For more information about the BGP Visibility Scanner project, we 
further refer you to the RIPE Labs article:

https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner
For any further questions, do not hesitate to contact us!

Thank you, best regards,
Andra


The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Andra Lutu

Dear all,

We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the 
interdomain level.
The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can use 
it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes 
that are not present in all the global routing tables we analyse) 
injected by a certain originating AS.
The query is very simple, it just requires to input the AS number for 
which you want to retrieve the originated LVPs, if any.
After checking the limited-visibility prefixes, we would appreciate any 
feedback that you can provide on the cause of the limited visibility (we 
provide a form with a few very short questions which you could fill in 
and submit).


Using a dataset from May 2nd 2013, we generated a list with the ASes 
which are originating LVPs: *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/fullASlist.html*
We would like to hear from any operator who might find this project 
interesting, and, in particular, from these large contributors to the 
LVPs set.
Please note that advertising prefixes with limited visibility does not 
mean that the originating AS is necessarily doing something wrong.
The ASes might be generating the LVPs knowingly (e.g., scoped 
advertisements). However, there might be cases where the origin AS might 
be unaware that some prefixes are not globally visible (when they 
should) or that others are leaking as a consequence of 
mis-configurations/slips.


Our purpose is to spread awareness about these latter phenomena, help 
eliminate the cause of unintended/accidental LVPs and upgrade this tool 
to an anomaly detection mechanism.
For more information on the definition and characteristics of a Limited 
Visibility prefix, please check the Frequently Asked Questions section 
of the webpage, available here: 
*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/Q_and_A_latest.html*


The tool works with publicly available BGP routing data, retrieved from 
the RIPE NCC RIS and RouteViews Projects. The results are updated on a 
daily basis.
For more information on the methodology we refer you to the slides of 
the NANOG57 presentation about the BGP Visibility Scanner:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.general.Lutu.BGP_visibility_scanner.19.pdf
Also, you can check the RIPE labs article about the BGP Visibility 
Scanner, available here: 
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner


We are looking forward to your feedback!

Thank you, best regards,
Andra


Re: The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Pretty nice. Thanks!

I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is there ?

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 IST Services Professional
 Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
 JJH48-ARIN


On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu andra.l...@imdea.org wrote:

 Dear all,
 
 We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the 
 interdomain level.
 The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can use it 
 to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes that are 
 not present in all the global routing tables we analyse) injected by a 
 certain originating AS.
 The query is very simple, it just requires to input the AS number for which 
 you want to retrieve the originated LVPs, if any.
 After checking the limited-visibility prefixes, we would appreciate any 
 feedback that you can provide on the cause of the limited visibility (we 
 provide a form with a few very short questions which you could fill in and 
 submit).
 
 Using a dataset from May 2nd 2013, we generated a list with the ASes which 
 are originating LVPs: *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/fullASlist.html*
 We would like to hear from any operator who might find this project 
 interesting, and, in particular, from these large contributors to the LVPs 
 set.
 Please note that advertising prefixes with limited visibility does not mean 
 that the originating AS is necessarily doing something wrong.
 The ASes might be generating the LVPs knowingly (e.g., scoped 
 advertisements). However, there might be cases where the origin AS might be 
 unaware that some prefixes are not globally visible (when they should) or 
 that others are leaking as a consequence of mis-configurations/slips.
 
 Our purpose is to spread awareness about these latter phenomena, help 
 eliminate the cause of unintended/accidental LVPs and upgrade this tool to an 
 anomaly detection mechanism.
 For more information on the definition and characteristics of a Limited 
 Visibility prefix, please check the Frequently Asked Questions section of the 
 webpage, available here: *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/Q_and_A_latest.html*
 
 The tool works with publicly available BGP routing data, retrieved from the 
 RIPE NCC RIS and RouteViews Projects. The results are updated on a daily 
 basis.
 For more information on the methodology we refer you to the slides of the 
 NANOG57 presentation about the BGP Visibility Scanner:
 http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.general.Lutu.BGP_visibility_scanner.19.pdf
 Also, you can check the RIPE labs article about the BGP Visibility Scanner, 
 available here: 
 https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner
 
 We are looking forward to your feedback!
 
 Thank you, best regards,
 Andra


Re: The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Andra Lutu

Hi Jason,

Thank you for your email! We are glad to hear that you like the work!

At the moment, you can only query the webpage and retrieve the LVPs per 
origin AS.
We haven't yet considered giving the option of downloading the complete 
report.
We are now working on a new version of the tool, and we will try to 
integrate your suggestion, thank you!


If you have any other suggestions or requests, don't hesitate to let us 
know!


Best regards,
Andra

On 05/15/2013 03:00 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:

Pretty nice. Thanks!

I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is 
there ?


/-- /

/*Jason Hellenthal*/

 IST Services Professional

 Inbox: /jhellent...@dataix.net mailto:jhellent...@dataix.net/

 JJH48-ARIN



On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu andra.l...@imdea.org 
mailto:andra.l...@imdea.org wrote:



Dear all,

We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at 
the interdomain level.
The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can 
use it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., 
prefixes that are not present in all the global routing tables we 
analyse) injected by a certain originating AS.
The query is very simple, it just requires to input the AS number for 
which you want to retrieve the originated LVPs, if any.
After checking the limited-visibility prefixes, we would appreciate 
any feedback that you can provide on the cause of the limited 
visibility (we provide a form with a few very short questions which 
you could fill in and submit).


Using a dataset from May 2nd 2013, we generated a list with the ASes 
which are originating LVPs: 
*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/fullASlist.html*
We would like to hear from any operator who might find this project 
interesting, and, in particular, from these large contributors to the 
LVPs set.
Please note that advertising prefixes with limited visibility does 
not mean that the originating AS is necessarily doing something wrong.
The ASes might be generating the LVPs knowingly (e.g., scoped 
advertisements). However, there might be cases where the origin AS 
might be unaware that some prefixes are not globally visible (when 
they should) or that others are leaking as a consequence of 
mis-configurations/slips.


Our purpose is to spread awareness about these latter phenomena, help 
eliminate the cause of unintended/accidental LVPs and upgrade this 
tool to an anomaly detection mechanism.
For more information on the definition and characteristics of a 
Limited Visibility prefix, please check the Frequently Asked 
Questions section of the webpage, available here: 
*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/Q_and_A_latest.html*


The tool works with publicly available BGP routing data, retrieved 
from the RIPE NCC RIS and RouteViews Projects. The results are 
updated on a daily basis.
For more information on the methodology we refer you to the slides of 
the NANOG57 presentation about the BGP Visibility Scanner:

http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.general.Lutu.BGP_visibility_scanner.19.pdf
Also, you can check the RIPE labs article about the BGP Visibility 
Scanner, available here: 
https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner


We are looking forward to your feedback!

Thank you, best regards,
Andra




Re: The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Rene Wilhelm


On 5/15/13 3:00 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:

Pretty nice. Thanks!

I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is there ?
At the RIPE NCC we are publishing aggregated dumps from our collective 
of 12 RIS route collectors every 8 hours. For each prefix we list the 
origin AS and the number of peers (on all collectors) which observe the 
prefix. If you are happy to do your own post-processing,  set your own 
boundaries on what to consider limited visibility prefixes, have a look 
at the IPv4 and IPv6 table dumps at http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/


Note that the fact that not all RIS peers give us a full BGP table blurs 
the counts somewhat. Prefixes which are globally visible may (today) 
have anywhere between 96 and 110 peers announcing the prefix to the RIS 
route collectors.


-- Rene
-- Jason Hellenthal IST Services Professional Inbox: 
jhellent...@dataix.net JJH48-ARIN On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu 
andra.l...@imdea.org wrote:

Dear all,

We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the 
interdomain level.
The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/*  and you can use it 
to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes that are not 
present in all the global routing tables we analyse) injected by a certain 
originating AS.
The query is very simple, it just requires to input the AS number for which 
you want to retrieve the originated LVPs, if any.
After checking the limited-visibility prefixes, we would appreciate any 
feedback that you can provide on the cause of the limited visibility (we provide a 
form with a few very short questions which you could fill in and submit).

Using a dataset from May 2nd 2013, we generated a list with the ASes which are 
originating LVPs:*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/fullASlist.html*
We would like to hear from any operator who might find this project 
interesting, and, in particular, from these large contributors to the LVPs set.
Please note that advertising prefixes with limited visibility does not mean 
that the originating AS is necessarily doing something wrong.
The ASes might be generating the LVPs knowingly (e.g., scoped advertisements). 
However, there might be cases where the origin AS might be unaware that some 
prefixes are not globally visible (when they should) or that others are leaking as 
a consequence of mis-configurations/slips.

Our purpose is to spread awareness about these latter phenomena, help 
eliminate the cause of unintended/accidental LVPs and upgrade this tool to an 
anomaly detection mechanism.
For more information on the definition and characteristics of a Limited 
Visibility prefix, please check the Frequently Asked Questions section of the 
webpage, available here:*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/Q_and_A_latest.html*

The tool works with publicly available BGP routing data, retrieved from the 
RIPE NCC RIS and RouteViews Projects. The results are updated on a daily basis.
For more information on the methodology we refer you to the slides of the 
NANOG57 presentation about the BGP Visibility Scanner:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.general.Lutu.BGP_visibility_scanner.19.pdf
Also, you can check the RIPE labs article about the BGP Visibility Scanner, 
available here:https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner

We are looking forward to your feedback!

Thank you, best regards,
Andra





Re: The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Jason Hellenthal
Awesome! Thank you to you as well!

-- 
 Jason Hellenthal
 IST Services Professional
 Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net
 JJH48-ARIN


On May 15, 2013, at 11:01, Rene Wilhelm wilh...@ripe.net wrote:

 
 On 5/15/13 3:00 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
 Pretty nice. Thanks!
 
 I don't suppose there is any straight text version of all this info is there 
 ?
 At the RIPE NCC we are publishing aggregated dumps from our collective of 12 
 RIS route collectors every 8 hours. For each prefix we list the origin AS and 
 the number of peers (on all collectors) which observe the prefix. If you are 
 happy to do your own post-processing,  set your own boundaries on what to 
 consider limited visibility prefixes, have a look at the IPv4 and IPv6 table 
 dumps at http://www.ris.ripe.net/dumps/
 
 Note that the fact that not all RIS peers give us a full BGP table blurs the 
 counts somewhat. Prefixes which are globally visible may (today) have 
 anywhere between 96 and 110 peers announcing the prefix to the RIS route 
 collectors.
 
 -- Rene
 -- Jason Hellenthal IST Services Professional Inbox: jhellent...@dataix.net 
 JJH48-ARIN On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu andra.l...@imdea.org wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the 
 interdomain level.
 The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/*  and you can use 
 it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes that 
 are not present in all the global routing tables we analyse) injected by a 
 certain originating AS.
 The query is very simple, it just requires to input the AS number for 
 which you want to retrieve the originated LVPs, if any.
 After checking the limited-visibility prefixes, we would appreciate any 
 feedback that you can provide on the cause of the limited visibility (we 
 provide a form with a few very short questions which you could fill in and 
 submit).
 
 Using a dataset from May 2nd 2013, we generated a list with the ASes which 
 are originating LVPs:*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/fullASlist.html*
 We would like to hear from any operator who might find this project 
 interesting, and, in particular, from these large contributors to the LVPs 
 set.
 Please note that advertising prefixes with limited visibility does not 
 mean that the originating AS is necessarily doing something wrong.
 The ASes might be generating the LVPs knowingly (e.g., scoped 
 advertisements). However, there might be cases where the origin AS might 
 be unaware that some prefixes are not globally visible (when they should) 
 or that others are leaking as a consequence of mis-configurations/slips.
 
 Our purpose is to spread awareness about these latter phenomena, help 
 eliminate the cause of unintended/accidental LVPs and upgrade this tool to 
 an anomaly detection mechanism.
 For more information on the definition and characteristics of a Limited 
 Visibility prefix, please check the Frequently Asked Questions section of 
 the webpage, available 
 here:*http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/Q_and_A_latest.html*
 
 The tool works with publicly available BGP routing data, retrieved from 
 the RIPE NCC RIS and RouteViews Projects. The results are updated on a 
 daily basis.
 For more information on the methodology we refer you to the slides of the 
 NANOG57 presentation about the BGP Visibility Scanner:
 http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog57/presentations/Wednesday/wed.general.Lutu.BGP_visibility_scanner.19.pdf
 Also, you can check the RIPE labs article about the BGP Visibility 
 Scanner, available 
 here:https://labs.ripe.net/Members/andra_lutu/the-bgp-visibility-scanner
 
 We are looking forward to your feedback!
 
 Thank you, best regards,
 Andra