Troy,
I think we first need to come to an agreement on whether its a good idea to
add a try-catch task, or whether to go for the errorproperty implementation.
I don't think it's a good idea to implement both.
Your task implementation is a bit limited, the ant-contrib task is more
powerful. I
- Original Message -
From: Dan Pupek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 9:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Numit2 and .Nunit files
We may be willing to add this support ourselves. What is the protocol for
submitting changes?
The NAnt
I think both are cases of inter-task communication. IMO current nant is
totally missing such communication. errorproperty proposal is very limited
implementation of such communication. I'd rather prefer making something
more robust enabling more advanced scenarios like examining what failed or
Gert,
My implementation of the task is extremely limited, but it exactly fits
our requirements :-) It would need to be reworked to fit the broader
requirements of the community before being released, of course.
Notwithstanding, you are right in that the task shouldn't be just
dropped in without
Martin,
just read through your previous thread.
I think that XML-based communication between tasks and the trycatch task
have different purposes. Specifically, trycatch is a flow control
device. Flow control can certainly be reproduced with increased task
verbosity, but using a flow control
Hi,
* Martin Aliger wrote on 09.07.2004 (08:40):
I think both are cases of inter-task communication. IMO current nant is
totally missing such communication. errorproperty proposal is very limited
implementation of such communication. I'd rather prefer making something
more robust enabling more
Hi again,
Some time ago I propose XML-like based communication - maybe its time
comes?
How do you see it now when there was enough time to consider it?
I don't like the we-do-anything-in-xml approach. XML is a
nice thing, but it certainly adds some overhead to
communications. I would
Hi,
* Martin Aliger wrote on 09.07.2004 (13:43):
to pass information from one task to other. Since speed is not main interest
in automated builds (sorry Matt - I still appreciate your optimization
work!) XML should be straightforward solution. But I never think we will
serialize XML on every
Peter (Horsfield, A)
I am in the process of setting up an NAnt build process to build our ~250
VB6 ActiveX DLLs/OCXs and need a tool/script to resolve the build
order/dependency tree. I am interested in this C# script you refer to in
your email of April 16, 2004. Would it be possible for you to
Hi,
In previous posts on this I was against a trycatch/ (or try-catch/
:-)) task. I have had time to rethink this position though, and
although I think it will make build scripts a little more complex (or a
lot depending how fancy you get) it would definitely be useful. In my
opinion I would
The
following error occurred when I tried to do a simple solution
build:
NAnt
0.84 (Build 0.84.1455.0; net-1.0.win32; release; 12/26/2003)Copyright (C)
2001-2003 Gerry Shawhttp://nant.sourceforge.net
Buildfile: file:///C:/Pragmatech/buildall.buildTarget(s) specified: build
build:
Title: error using solution tag
System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: The system cannot find the file specified
at System.Diagnostics.Process.StartWithCreateProcess(ProcessStartInfo startIn
fo)
at System.Diagnostics.Process.Start()
at System.Diagnostics.Process.Start(ProcessStartInfo
I'm a real NAnt newbie so this may be a naive question but should I be able to build
NAnt in Visual Studio (2003)?
I tried the .sln file that comes with the 0.84 release and that gave me an error when
trying to build NAnt.Core:
Cannot delete the project output: is the file read-only?
A failure
Leo,
I think this issue was fixed post 0.84. Can you try using the latest
nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Leo Steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:52 PM
Subject: [nant-dev]
Loads of solution task issues were fixed post 0.84, can you try using the
latest nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) ?
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Jahirul Islam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject:
Roger,
NAnt cannot be built using VS.NET 2002/2003, see
http://nant.sourceforge.net/faq.html#building-vsnet-1.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 7:58 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Newbie question - Building NAnt in Visual
Felice,
Please try using a recent nightly build
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds).
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Felice Vittoria [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 4:37 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] bug report
Hello all,
I am using
Brian,
Please try using a recent nightly build
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds).
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Chance, Brian -- 7275 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 8:56 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] error using solution tag
Gary,
This should be fixed in cvs now.
Thanks,
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Gary Feldman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:27 PM
Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Cl.exe /I for additional include
directories
From:
19 matches
Mail list logo
