Greco Giuseppe wrote:
what's about something like that? Giving the following resource files
Global.resx
Another.resx
... .resx
we could have a separate resource manager for each resource file,
This means storing *all* the resources in a single assembly
I don't quite understand how your
Bugs item #1154339, was opened at 2005-03-01 17:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drieseng
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1154339group_id=31650
Category: Core
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Greco Giuseppe wrote:
what's about something like that? Giving the following
resource files
Global.resx
Another.resx
... .resx
we could have a separate resource manager for each resource file,
This means storing *all* the resources in a single assembly
I don't quite understand how your
Bugs item #1154339, was opened at 2005-03-01 10:19
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by johnwebbcole
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=402868aid=1154339group_id=31650
Category: Core
Group: None
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:36:40 +0100, Giuseppe Greco
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:41 +0800, Troy Laurin wrote:
[DCL]
Would you suggest something like this?
sealed class ResourceUtils
{
private ResourceUtils() {}
public static readonly ResourceUtils Instance =
Greco Giuseppe wrote:
what's about something like that? Giving the following resource files
Global.resx
Another.resx
... .resx
we could have a separate resource manager for each resource file,
This means storing *all* the resources in a single assembly
I don't
