In my opinion, the .NET community really lacks coordination right now
..
Which is something Apache does a terrific job at for the Java
open-source
community .
Gert
I agree with you Gert, there is a lot going on at Apache but you can
tell that there is one entity behind it all. I think the .NET
- Original Message -
From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:53 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)
In my opinion
Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're still
stuck with the GPL license :-)
I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they want, so long as
they aren't bound to the gpl by other source code or libraries in the
application. NAnt may be bound to the
and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)
Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're
still
stuck with the GPL license :-)
I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they want, so long
as
they aren't bound to the gpl by other source code or libraries
Sent: Wed 10/8/2003 10:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject:Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next
release)
Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's perhaps why we're
still
stuck with the GPL license :-)
I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do
:50 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle
next release)
Well, to be honest : I don't have a clue ... That's
perhaps why we're
still
stuck with the GPL license :-)
I am pretty sure the copyright holder can do whatever they
want, so long
as
they aren't
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
great to see that one of the driving forces
thanks
behind Ant is also interested in NAnt :)
More and longer than you think. ;-)
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=463245forum_id=863
I'd think that Ian and Gerry
