RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-10 Thread Cort Schaefer
This is what I use -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 10:48 AM To: Mark Griffiths Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Next release Docs, Docs, Docs... Okay, here is what I see

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-10 Thread Gert Driesen
PROTECTED] To: 'Scott Hernandez' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Mark Griffiths' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 11:06 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release This is what I use -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Sansone, Aaron
I agree with Dave, documentation needs to be addressed. I really like the Wiki idea. We used a Wiki for documentation on my last project with good success. Our customer resisted it at first our original idea was to get the users to help with the documentation by editing the pages. It was

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Dave Sanders
Quoting Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: That sounds like a great idea. Scott, what do you think? If there's any problem with getting it on the sourceforge servers, I'd be willing to share some space on my hosting (provided we find a wiki we can run there). I'm using PureEnergy hosting for

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-06 Thread Ian MacLean
Sansone, Aaron wrote: shameless_plug I'd be willing to take a look at deploying a wiki to my NCode Sourceforge project to see if it works. NCode is a VS.Net IDE Add-In that does code completion from live templates (just like IntelliJ if anyone has used that). urlncode.sourceforge.net/url

[nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Mark Griffiths
Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun-2002 - nearly 8 months ago. Is there anything in particular that is holding the release up? Anything that I could lend a hand to? Cheers -MG ---

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Turpin, Jay
the solution. - Charles Kettering -Original Message- From: Mark Griffiths [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 9:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] Next release Are you any closer to releasing a new version 'proper'? The 0.7.9 release is dated 11-jun

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Scott Hernandez
file. Maybe after we release NAntContrib we can do a combined MSI distributions with tools and all. - Original Message - From: Mark Griffiths [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 8:15 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Next release Are you any closer

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Tomas Restrepo
What can we do as a community to ensure that this doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott outlined... I think part of the problem is that it seems Scott is the only one of the project admins that has been around

Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Scott Hernandez
McManus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 12:39 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Next release What can we do as a community to ensure that this doesn't happen again? I would say the best solution is for people to jump on board and volunteer one of the tasks Scott

RE: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-05 Thread Miller, Kevin
-Original Message- From: Scott Hernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 3:52 PM To: Miller, Kevin; Griffin Caprio; Mark Griffiths; Jeffrey McManus Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Next release Kevin, you are correct, the only way to get this going

RE: [nant-dev] Next release - and Nunit2

2003-02-05 Thread Arnoldus, Michael
About the next release - I'm all for releasing what we have right now. Also, consider that last time the topic came up, I said the NUnit2 support stuff was a showstopper, and I've since fixed it (what could be fixed without changing NUnit itself). I agree nunit2 is not a showstopper - but as