So, the question is: should I start developing the task and
also leave the onFail part for targets?
Have anybody really analyzed the way in which I've done onfail -- do
you have some claims on its implementation?
Also, how should I address the problem of getting log only for the
part really incl
-
> GD> From: "Ivan Tarasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GD> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GD> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:24 PM
> GD> Subject: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch
>
>
> >> Hello Gert,
> >>
&
;Ivan Tarasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GD> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GD> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:24 PM
GD> Subject: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch
>> Hello Gert,
>>
>> the problem is, that I don't want to get all th
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Tarasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:24 PM
Subject: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch
> Hello Gert,
>
> the problem is, that I don't want to get
nt SDK docs for more information) :
This will result in a single email for the results of all nested builds.
Gert
- Original Message -
From: "Ivan Tarasov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Octobe
Hello nant-developers,
I want to discuss some ideas I have on failures which occur during the
build process. I've been desperately trying to solve the problems
which I'm going to address in this letter using the standard features
of NAnt and I've found that the ways by which I can solve these
prob
