FW: [nant-dev] Adding Validators

2002-09-30 Thread Barkley, Chris
Gerry, The final verdict after hours of debugging I have found that the Validators are never called. I have put breakpoints in all of them and ran scripts that contained tasks that had all of the validators defined for them. Not one break point was ever hit. The following line in the

RE: [nant-dev] Adding Validators

2002-09-30 Thread Scott Hernandez
I would call this feature missing a bug. It seems like we need to add some unit tests to check this so more features don't disappear. I looked in an old snapshot of nant (circa may 17th) and there is validation related code commented out there. It must have been removed from the file sometime

RE: [nant-dev] Adding Validators

2002-09-30 Thread Shaw, Gerry
Something is broken. Thanks for letting us know. Some unit tests are going to be needed to catch the fact that the task attribute validators are not being called. -Original Message- From: Barkley, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 5:22 PM To: Shaw,

Re: [nant-dev] Adding Validators

2002-09-30 Thread Ian MacLean
Barkley, Chris wrote: With this method for validating Int32 you lose one of the validators features and that is setting a defined range for the integer. Is it possible to use both? Good point. We should use both. Then I guess its just booleanValidator we don't need. Ian -Original

[nant-dev] Re: Fileset change

2002-09-30 Thread Martin Aliger
Hi, I just done somethink very simillar as addition to nant for mono. Mono classes build uses file called list which is in each directory of tree along with .build file (it is intended to run as mcs @list). So reference the same file within .build file seems logical. In this file are only