We currently only support two diffferent platforms, namely win32 and unix.
For win32, we support .NET 1.0, .NET 1.1, .NET CF 1.0, SSCLI 1.0 and Mono
1.0, while for unix we only support the Mono framework (and Mac OsX is
considered to be unix).
For Mono on unix we've configured the runtime engine
The useruntimeengine attribute itself is actually documented in the help for
the nightly builds
(http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/help/tasks/exectask.html), but perhaps
we should make it more clear as to what it exactly does ...
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Met @ Uber [EMAIL
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So what we need is a way of determining that NAnt is running on Mac,
so we can create a third platform for Mac...
No, what you need is a way of determining whether you can use mono or
have to fall back to mint. AFAIU mono is only
On 14 Oct 2003, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I assume adding a mint config in addition to
NAnt.Console.exe.config.linux
I was obviously looking at an out-of-date Makefile, sorry.
Stefan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
IANAL
If and when, Nant chooses to migrate to a different license,
it will have to handle the copyrights of the contributers.
Scott Hernandez and I briefly discussed this on the Draco.Net
list. Scott wanted references, and I haven't responded because
I had to take some time to look them up.
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Tom Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IANAL
If and when, Nant chooses to migrate to a different license,
it will have to handle the copyrights of the contributers.
IANAL either, but what you say is 100% the same that I've seen happen
in similar cases for other projects.
At
Yes, this has always concerned me and is something I think we need to remedy
on any future contributions. We need some kind of declaimer/license
agreement that people submitting patches agree to. Then we can be free to
make these kinds of changes without contacting a hundred people, or keeping
Isn't it common to assign copyright to on eor two people or some
registered body ? So for apache projects its the apache foundation, for
mono its Ximian etc
I think at this stage we would have difficulty tracking down all
contributers.
Ian
Scott Hernandez wrote:
Yes, this has always concerned
