RE: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Jason Pettys
No comments other than just this morning I was thinking the same thing. Let's have a release! - Jason -Original Message- From: Bernard Vander Beken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 2:39 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt

Re: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Tomas Restrepo
Bernard, In short, bringing out a new release (0.8.0) is needed. Note: A combined NAnt + NAntContrib package Would Be Nice as well, but first things first. I suggest a no-new-features-are-needed approach for this version. The question is: What really *needs* to be done before the new

RE: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Kevin Miller
Everytime this thread is brought up I always have to chime in and say here here. So as expected I totally agree. I have 0.7.9.0+ version of NAnt + misc NAntContrib tasks that I support so that we can actually use NAnt in some stable fashion. I would rather base my support on a more current

Re: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Matthew Mastracci
While everyone's awake in here - can I ask which branch tag the next version of NAnt is coming from? I'm sitting on the resx and license tasks for the moment. As well, I'm still trying to get CVS under windows to work over PLink to sourceforge so I can actually check in. :) Kevin Miller

RE: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Mark Griffiths
I recently found tortoisecvs to be the most painless way to work with sourceforge from nt/xp. It comes with a customised version of plink to handle the ssl stuff and is fairly painless to setup. MG -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ian

RE: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Kevin Miller
Yep this is the way it works. We start the thread and someone goes off topic and the powers that be never make up their mind. OpenSource creedo - Release early and release often. Kevin Miller -Original Message- From: Matthew Mastracci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday,

Re: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Ian MacLean
Kevin Miller wrote: Yep this is the way it works. We start the thread and someone goes off topic and the powers that be never make up their mind. OK valid point. And as one of the project admins I take my share of the blame for this. Gerry Scott and I discussed a release last time and it

RE: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread John Barstow
I am aware of the NUnit to NUnit 2 migration, and have been able to use the latest NAnt and NUnit 2 using the exec task/console runner workaround. Hi, first-time user - just figured out that 0.7.9 is badly out of date, now using daily snapshot. I need to set up an NUnit2 task for my project -

RE: Re: [nant-dev] FAQ: The next NAnt version

2002-11-20 Thread Shaw, Gerry
Placing the responsibility of getting a release out on the project admins isn't going to work if the past is any indication of the future :) The best way to get a release done is for a number of people to take a nant-snapshot and QA it to the level that they would feel comfortable to say that