Just a note- there was recently a submission that added a webmap
URL<->filesystem mapping for the solution task. This allows the
task to handle URL mappings by doing a simple URL pattern
lookup. Would this handle your situation?
On Fri, 2003-08-01 at 15:00, J. Jason De Lorme wrote:
> On the li
J. Jason De Lorme wrote:
*QUESTION* I've followed the code guidelines on the site, but how do I
actually get this code into SourceForge as an alpha / beta for people to
ridicule, rip-apart, poke holes and flame me on ;-)? I wouldn't want it in
the actual NAnt bits until many people had used in env
On the list of the many annoying nuances of Visual Studio is how it adds web
projects to the .sln file. For instance if I were to create a project of
type 'ASP.Net Web Application'; VS.net (2002/2003) will add among other
things this entry to the solution file (MyApp.sln):
Project("{FAE04EC0-301F-
I’m having this problem when attempting
to run a test build of one of our .NET solution files. Do you have any ideas about what could
be causing the problem?
D:\Downloads\NAnt\nant-0.8.3-rc2\nant-0.8.3-rc2\bin>nant
NAnt version 0.8.3
Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sou
Hi
I novice to Nant and
Ant.
I try to using task
And got those answer
:
build:
[solution] Starting solution build.
[solution] Included projects:
[solution] -
C:\aCRM\src\Core\Bkc.Oblik.aCRM.Common\Bkc.Oblik.aCRM.Common.csproj
[solution] Reference projects:
Total time: 0 secon
-- Part 1 --
Hi NAnters,
I was just editing some build files and testing out some things. The
thought occurred to me that certain tasks don't have as useful a message
output as would sometimes be desired. Take the following task:
The typical output is:
[delete] Deleting 1 directo
I keep on obtaining the following error when using the solution task - Sorry
for the cross-post but I have a build deadline for this Friday.
NAnt version 0.8.3 Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Gerry Shaw
http://nant.sourceforge.net
settings warning: frameworkinfo netcf-1.0 is invalid and has not been
l
I think it's a great idea.Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter,I like the idea. See what others say and then we can look at adding it. Your approach looks pretty much correct. Don't know why you can't build though.Ian>-- Part 1 -->Hi NAnters,>>I was just editing some build files and testing
Hi,
I don't think I really like adding a message attribute to the Task class,
and having two ways of outputting messages to the build log.
The echo task is more powerful as it allows messages to be output only when
a condition is met (separate from the task conditions), and it allows you to
set a
