http://www.eugenebelyaev.com/begblog/general/50.html
Implemented as an addin to VS.net which could prove to be interesting if :
1) they replace the existing c# project system with somthing a bit
nicer and
2) that project system allows you to use an alternative build tool ( ie
NAnt )
WOW ! I hope they can bring some of the magic of IDEA to .NET !!!
Gert
- Original Message -
From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: [nant-dev] jetbrains and new c# IDE
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unless there's a slight chance that Apache is going to accept .NET
projects :-)
At the risk of repeating myself, I'm sure that the ASF would not
reject a project just because it used .NET.
The ASF hosts projects written in C, Perl,
Dmitry,
Sorry about the slow response. I took at look at your Visual cpp
support. There were a couple of formatting/ code style issue which I
have fixed - nothing major.
However I'm getting lots of null reference errors related to fileConfigs
ie when you have extra compiler settings (
Especially when you look at the new features in IDEA 4.0
http://www.intellij.com/idea/features4
I'm going to stop now. I don't want to seem like a marketing drone for
jetbrains.
Ian
WOW ! I hope they can bring some of the magic of IDEA to .NET !!!
Gert
- Original Message -
From:
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003, Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure that I agree with changing the license to a BSD or
Apache-style license.
As you are responding to a mail of mine, please note that I've just
explained some things about different licenses and what would be
involved
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have one question about the wording though. The section
Redistribution and USE (my emphasis) in source and binary
forms. Does this mean that if I build a set of tasks and compile
them into a separate assembly, but don't ship the NAnt
Hi all,
I do not bother about licences much but:
NAnt works well as a GPL'd project. It's effectively a stand-alone
project. Any company wanting to incorporate it could simply bundle
the executable.
You cannot write a NAnt task that uses parts of NAnt's API and
distribute that task
I like onFail attribute slightly better then current nant.onfailure. Setting
some special property looks little weird for me. But it is enough for most
projects, I think.
Martin
Hello Gert,
such a task does really makes sense, still, I feel we have two
(a bit) different approaches to solve
As for fileset re-definitions - we allow properties to be re-defined to
it probably makes sense to do the same for datatype references. If we
agree that this is the desired behaviour I'll add the change.
Maybe defaults to throw BuildError (instead of Internal Error) and enable
override=true
So, the question is: should I start developing the trycatch task and
also leave the onFail part for targets?
Have anybody really analyzed the way in which I've done onfail -- do
you have some claims on its implementation?
Also, how should I address the problem of getting log only for the
part
I think we should ask ourselves what types of uses we would want NAnt to be
available to. Here are two scenarios.
[1] A commerical company wants to release a custom task and charge money for
it. Do we want to allow this?
[2] A commerical company wants to distribute a customized version of
All of these scenarios should be allowed, IMHO.
- Original Message -
From: Brant Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing
I think we should ask ourselves what types of uses we would want NAnt to
be
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ian MacLean wrote:
Matt,
what are your specific objections to a BSD style licence ? Is it the
greater permissiveness or just that its not GPL ?
My largest concern is not that a company can use BSD-code, but rather
I agree, though in [2] and [3] I believe that changes (if any) to the
core NAnt code should be contributed back.
Scott Hernandez wrote:
All of these scenarios should be allowed, IMHO.
- Original Message -
From: Brant Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October
While replying to your note, I noticed the following on our license page:
http://nant.sourceforge.net/license.html
---
NAnt ships with a prebuilt version of NDoc. The NAnt license does not
apply to these components located in the bin folder of the distribution.
NDoc is licensed under the GNU
] ResGenTask problem
Seems to bug introdused in last night build 20031010 with 20031007 all
work
fine
[solution] - C:\Core\res\strings.ru-RU.resx
[solution] ResGenTask Input:
C:\Core\res\strings.ru-RU.resx Output:
C:\DOCUME~1\amid\LOCALS~1\Temp\hi771plq
17 matches
Mail list logo