Re: Re: [nant-dev] Separating targets into individual files

I don't know what I was doing wrong, but I've now got the behavior I was seeking. Very weird. // Neil - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 12:06:18 +0900 Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Separating targets into individual files

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ?

I haven't really given it too much though, but I don't think we should have a very long rc period. We should really try to release versions more frequently, without sacrificing quality ofcourse. I was just thinking about those people who can't use nightly builds for corporate reasons, and

RE: [nant-dev] Nant XmlLogger

Hi Nicke, good call I think. Verbosity problem is here, and I really want so solve it, but I prefer to do it after release. I also think (and beleive others also) we need shorter release cycle (aprox. 4 a year?) 1/: I didnt catch it - sorry. Structure of Nant's XML log is pretty vague - thats

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ?

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère Sent: maandag 22 november 2004 11:26 To: Gert Driesen Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ? I haven't really given it too much though, but I

RE: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ?

ps : I've got a small nant function called is-assembly (to determine whether a file is a valid assembly or not). Is it worth contributing ? I'm using it to separate my legacy dll from assemblies. I know there's the get-assembly-name trick, but maybe it's worth it. Tell me what

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ?

Martin Aliger wrote: ps : I've got a small nant function called is-assembly (to determine whether a file is a valid assembly or not). Is it worth contributing ? I'm using it to separate my legacy dll from assemblies. I know there's the get-assembly-name trick, but maybe

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt 0.85 release - how ?

ok I'll push a patch tonight then --Thibaut --- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.

[nant-dev] Internal Error - can you help?

NAnt 0.84 (Build 0.84.1455.0; net-1.0.win32; release; 12/26/2003) Copyright (C) 2001-2003 Gerry Shaw http://nant.sourceforge.net Buildfile: file:///C:/Inetpub/wwwroot/CCOM_Web/SupportFiles/TestBuild.build Target(s) specified: Build Build: NantTestProject: [solution] Starting solution build.

RE: [nant-dev] solution tag bug

Brad, Can you verify whether you still get the error using the latest nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/latest/) ? Thanks ! Gert -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brad Langhorst Sent: zondag 21 november 2004 21:53

RE: [nant-dev] is-assembly patch

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thibaut Barrère Sent: maandag 22 november 2004 23:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [nant-dev] is-assembly patch Here's a patch implementing function assembly::is-assembly(assemblyFilename).

Re: [nant-dev] is-assembly patch

good point! I put it in assembly in the patch, but now that you talk about file, it sounds better. So I'd vote for file. anyone else ?? On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:19:19 +0100, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[nant-dev] Fileset / delete task change

Hi Matthew, I've had another look at how our delete task is working right now, and the more I think of it, the more I'm convinced that we should change it to match the Ant delete task. Right now, we remove all directories that are matched by the fileset. But this does not respect any excludes.