Re: [nant-dev] property with parens (was sysinfo task)

2010-03-26 Thread Gert Driesen
Hey Dominik, What version of NAnt are you running ? I get a failure for the "foo(bar)" property: Property name 'foo(bar)' is invalid. Gert -Original Message- From: Dominik Guder [mailto:o...@guder.org] Sent: vrijdag 26 maart 2010 22:37 To: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject:

[nant-dev] property with parens (was sysinfo task)

2010-03-26 Thread Dominik Guder
Am 26.03.2010 15:53, schrieb Ryan Boggs: >> Another point which needs attantion (propably for 1.0) is that I was >> able to define a property with parens without getting an exception at >> definition time. More detail later. >> >Can you provide an example when you get a moment? I would like to look

Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task

2010-03-26 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi, On Mar 26, 2010, at 11:38 AM, "Gert Driesen" wrote: > Hey Ryan, > > Check the docs of the task. > Note that its not officially deprecated, so I'd still fix any issues. Oh, I know. But if the decision to depreciate ever occurs, it would be good to know that there is a good/better alter

Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task

2010-03-26 Thread Gert Driesen
Hey Ryan, Check the docs of the task. Note that its not officially deprecated, so I'd still fix any issues. Gert -Original Message- From: Ryan Boggs [mailto:rmbo...@gmail.com] Sent: vrijdag 26 maart 2010 15:53 To: Dominik Guder Cc: nant-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [na

Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task

2010-03-26 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi, On Mar 26, 2010, at 2:07 AM, Dominik Guder wrote: > Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Gert Driesen: >> Hi Ryan, >> >> I guess it won't make it in time for the 0.90 release. >> Personally, I even consider the sysinfo task deprecated. >> > > On Mar 25, 2010, at 8:10 AM, "Gert Driesen"

Re: [nant-dev] sysinfo task

2010-03-26 Thread Dominik Guder
Am 25.03.2010 17:12, schrieb Gert Driesen: > Hi Ryan, > > I guess it won't make it in time for the 0.90 release. > Personally, I even consider the sysinfo task deprecated. > On Mar 25, 2010, at 8:10 AM, "Gert Driesen" wrote: > Ryan, > > We cannot allow parenthesis