Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-07 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] 0.8.3 final Jaroslaw Kowalski wrote: Is there any updated roadmap

Re: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task

2003-09-07 Thread Gert Driesen
I actually implemented this task and added it to cvs, but remarks and suggestions are still welcome (as always) ... Gert - Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 10:50 AM Subject: [nant-dev

Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework

2003-09-07 Thread Gert Driesen
) ... Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 7:19 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework Firstly I

Re: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
to reach a certain status ... ... otherwise performing two actions in a row (in case of a restart, this means stop and start) will cause problems ... Gert - Original Message - From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:55 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset

Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset option fromframework

2003-09-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:52 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [PATCH] New fileset

Re: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task

2003-09-09 Thread Gert Driesen
problems ... Gert - Original Message - From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 5:36 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] servicecontroller task Great Idea. I'd love to get a few more exec

Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final

2003-09-09 Thread Gert Driesen
Yeah, I agree we should use an existing (open-source) library. I'm pretty sure ftp will be available in some future revision of the .NET Framework, but that will leave users of other frameworks in the cold, and we wouldn't want that ... Gert - Original Message - From: Clayton Harbour

Re: [nant-dev] FileSet

2003-09-09 Thread Gert Driesen
Just my personal opinion, but I'm not sure I like this ... It is just a personal preference, I do know Ant supports it (but I don't think it's used much) ... I prefer using multiple includes elements, that way it's easier to add xml comments to each elements. I would rather fix this in the docs

Re: [nant-dev] [patch] support dynamic assemblies in TaskBuilder.cs

2003-09-11 Thread Gert Driesen
Your patch was submitted to cvs. Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Dmitry Jemerov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:51 PM Subject: [nant-dev] [patch] support dynamic assemblies in TaskBuilder.cs Hello nant-developers, I'm now

Re: [nant-dev] solution task addin

2003-09-12 Thread Gert Driesen
Look very good, but I have some remarks : use BuildElementCollection("compilerargument"or "compilerargs") instead of [BuildElementArray("arg")] that will : - make it clear that those are argument that will be passed to the compiler - allow us to use a more structured build layout

Re: [nant-dev] solution task addin

2003-09-12 Thread Gert Driesen
/ /compilerargs /solution Martin - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] solution task addin use BuildElementCollection

Re: [nant-dev] Re: foreach

2003-09-12 Thread Gert Driesen
Good catch again, martin. It would be even better if you could also creates unit tests for the fixes you post :-) Gert - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger To: ! nant Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:01 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: foreach Here is

[nant-dev] Call task (dependency resolution)

2003-09-15 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I've committed the following (possible breaking) change to cvs (which should also be available in today's nightly build) : The call task will now always execute both the specified target, and all its dependencies. In previous versions of NAnt, you could force the execution of a target by

[nant-dev] Nightly builds

2003-09-19 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, As you may have noticed, we've finally got the nightly build process running again for both NAnt and NAntContrib. For NAnt, the nightly builds are available at http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds, while the task doc for the nightly build is available online at

Re: [nant-dev] Mono NAnt

2003-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Richard, You might have to manually update the path to your mono installation in the following attributes of the mono-1.0-linux framework node in nant root\src\NAnt.Console\NAnt.Console.exe.config.linux : sdkdirectory (default is /usr/local/bin) frameworkdirectory (default is

Re: [nant-dev] NAntSchemaTask under construction

2003-09-24 Thread Gert Driesen
don't worry, enjoy your trip ! Gert - Original Message - From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2003 9:48 PM Subject: [nant-dev] NAntSchemaTask under construction I have updated things a little bit, but handling of arrays and

Re: [nant-dev] SqlTask Too Verbose

2003-09-27 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jay, I updated the SqlTask yesterday to be less verbose, let me know if that works for you (you'll need to rebuild both NAnt and NAntContrib from cvs, or wait for the next nighlty build) Gert - Original Message - From: Turpin, Jay [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [nant-dev] nant.onfailure

2003-10-01 Thread Gert Driesen
I'm not sure about this, but I think this change was committed after a branch was made for the 0.8.3 release ... I'll look into this later ... Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Eric Fetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003

Re: [nant-dev] nant.onfailure

2003-10-01 Thread Gert Driesen
I verified this, and it is indeed only available in the 0.8.4 nightly builds ... - Original Message - From: Eric Fetzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 5:29 PM Subject: [nant-dev] nant.onfailure What happened to nant.failure

Re: [nant-dev] Very Minor Bug.

2003-10-01 Thread Gert Driesen
I think this error message was removed from NAnt (in cvs), as a task nested it a task container (eg. if/ifnot task) will now cause the task to fail (and the build if failonerror is set to true for the task container), but thanks for the report anyway ... keep'em coming ... Gert - Original

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-05 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 11:06 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] Same as the Ant replace task. Replace tokens in a text

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-05 Thread Gert Driesen
something like that yes :-) but instead of having a separate task for that purpose, filterchain support would be added to existing tasks (like copy, zip, ...) Gert - Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-05 Thread Gert Driesen
to be honest, I'm not sure about that one ... If necessary we could ofcourse create a task for that, but I was just saying we don't necessary need one ... didn't really give it much thought yet ... Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 4:25 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] +1, mainly because I've just found a use for it in our

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-06 Thread Gert Driesen
No we're working on the main branch, but I noticed that, at times, anoncvs is more than 5 days behind ... Gert - Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 06, 2003 1

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-06 Thread Gert Driesen
n="@" endtoken="@" filter token="TEST" value="123" / /filterset filterset begintoken="#" endtoken="#" filter token="DUNNO" value="WHAT" / /filterset /filtersets/move I haven't really tested it thoroughly,

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] (Patches)

2003-10-06 Thread Gert Driesen
I would advise you to have a look at the patch that was submitted as part of bug report #805307 (http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=805307group_id=31 650atid=402868) and at the remarks I made to the author (included in the log of the bug report) ... I really think we can use

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] (Patches)

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
I was busy with lots of things and didn't read your message thoroughly ... Sorry about that Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: James C. Papp [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 8:46 AM

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
Oct 2003, Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For third party filterreaders only the first notation is supported, ofcourse. in Ant 1.5, that is. With Ant 1.6beta things have changed dramatically. http://ant.apache.org/manual-1.6beta/CoreTypes/custom-programming.html for the short version

Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 4:52 PM Subject: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] I think I need

Re: [nant-dev] solution task

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
for solution task (described below) is good idea? I want to ensure that if I do it, it will be accepted (alot of work) Martin - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11:19 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think I need to read up

Re: [nant-dev] Patch Requirements

2003-10-07 Thread Gert Driesen
Before posting patches, first make sure there's interest in your patch. We wouldn't want you wasting efforts on a patch that will never be committed ... Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Met @ Uber [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: NAnt-Devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
Lalit, Can you submit this bug report as a formal bug using the bug tracker (at http://sourceforge.net/projects/nant/) ? Clayton, can you have a look at this ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Lalit Parashar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07,

Re: [nant-dev] RE: filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Mitch Denny [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 1:23 AM Subject: [nant-dev] RE: filterchains/sets other was: [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] Hi

Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release]

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 9:54 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] [Fwd: Ready to tackle next release] in Ant 1.5, that is. With Ant 1.6beta things have changed dramatically.

Re: [nant-dev] onFail patch

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
Ivan, I haven't had time to read through your length email yet, but I still want to share some information with you ... NAnt already has support for executing a specific target when the build fails by creating a property named nant.onfailure with a value corresponding with the name of the target

Re: [nant-dev] DeleteTask Patch

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
There's still a bug in the patch, so I wouldn't commit it for now ... Your patch will make the delete task a lot more chatty, as it will now output the filename of every file in the fileset even when the task is not in verbose mode ... The reason why there was a verbose argument in the

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release)

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 3:53 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] NAnt and Ant (was: Ready to tackle next release) In my opinion

Re: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ivan Tarasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:24 PM Subject: Re[2]: [nant-dev] onFail patch Hello Gert, the problem is, that I don't want to get all the log (I want to track the subproject, which

Re: [nant-dev] DeleteTask Patch

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
consistent. If you don't take it, you should take the rest because its a lot more consistent. I'll make the fix if you'd like, else I'll leave it alone. On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 13:27, Gert Driesen wrote: There's still a bug in the patch, so I wouldn't commit it for now ... Your patch

Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report

2003-10-08 Thread Gert Driesen
Should we have something similar to the -bugreport switch of the .NET compiler ? If no build is executed, it would just prompt the user for information regarding the problem. If a build is executed, it would log all build output to the specified file and then ask for additional information ...

Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks

2003-10-09 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Giuseppe Greco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:10 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Problems with zip and fileset tasks Gert, OK, I was using a three weeks old version... three weeks old ??? A lot can happen

Re: [nant-dev] Licensing

2003-10-09 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:54 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Licensing Thanks for the info Stefan, I tend to agree with you re FSF and associated philosophy. There

Re: [nant-dev] jetbrains and new c# IDE

2003-10-10 Thread Gert Driesen
WOW ! I hope they can bring some of the magic of IDEA to .NET !!! Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:24 AM Subject: [nant-dev] jetbrains and new c# IDE

[nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] ResGenTask problem

2003-10-10 Thread Gert Driesen
I already had this issue fixed on my local system, but I'm testing some other changes before committing the fix ... Gert - Original Message - From: Dmitriy Bezugliy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 10:50 PM Subject:

Re: [nant-dev] Exec Task OS Specific

2003-10-14 Thread Gert Driesen
We currently only support two diffferent platforms, namely win32 and unix. For win32, we support .NET 1.0, .NET 1.1, .NET CF 1.0, SSCLI 1.0 and Mono 1.0, while for unix we only support the Mono framework (and Mac OsX is considered to be unix). For Mono on unix we've configured the runtime engine

Re: [nant-dev] Exec Task OS Specific

2003-10-14 Thread Gert Driesen
PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: NAnt-Devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 10:34 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Exec Task OS Specific Apparently its just not documented, but the attribute itself works. Thanks a lot. And that shouldn't break anything between OS's right

Re: [nant-dev] Solution Task changes for C++ project support

2003-10-16 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Scott, I just finished rewriting part of the C++ support starting from the changes you made ... However, too be honest I know almost nothing about C+, and I also wasn't always sure when to read config setting from baseConfig and when from fileConfig (in VcProject.BuildCPPFiles) ... I

Re: [nant-dev] userdocs

2003-10-24 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NAntDev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:48 PM Subject: [nant-dev] userdocs Hi all, I am in the process of making more changes to the userdocs. In the past we had referred to the userdocs (at least in

Re: [nant-dev] patch for read-only config file during build

2003-10-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Patch committed. Thanks a lot Gert - Original Message - From: Tharen D. Debold [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 3:40 AM Subject: [nant-dev] patch for read-only config file during build If you use cvs to fetch read-only files, nant.exe.config ends

Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
A recent change made by Ian will fill a StringCollection with the names of all available cultures in the static constructor of CompilerBase, and apparently that's what causing a NullReferenceExeption. Are you building Mono from cvs ? I think ICU (http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/) was added to

Re: [nant-dev] Internal error with nant using Visual Studio .NET 2003: Could n ot find a part of the path C:\DOCUME~1\ththomas\LOCALS~1\Temp\9rzsshgh.

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
I'm pretty sure this issue was fixed post 0.8.3, so you might have better luck using one of the latest nightly builds (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) Hope this helps, Gert - Original Message - From: Thomas, Tim L. (Semy) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: White,

Re: [nant-dev] solution throws exception on path with backslashes

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
Michael, Can you please try the same using a recent nightly build of NAnt (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) and get back to me with the results ? Thanks for the report, Gert - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003

Re: [nant-dev] Replace Task

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
We've decided that we should implement filterchains and filterreader support for NAnt (comparable to what Ant has : http://ant.apache.org/manual/CoreTypes/filterchain.html) and build the replace task using that ... Feel free to start implementing this ofcourse ;) Gert - Original Message

Re: [nant-dev] BUG: NAnt.VSNet.SolutionTask

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
This was fixed post 0.8.3, can you try a recent nightly build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: David Haubenstricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:28 PM Subject: [nant-dev] BUG:

Re: [nant-dev] NANT, C# and web projects

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
I think there can be two possible causes for this : - the resx file is not valid xml (at times VS.NET corrupts resx files) - the resx file contains references to types that are not available when the resx is compiled (eg. the resx file has reference to .NET Framework 1.1 types, but you're

Re: [nant-dev] INTERNAL ERROR

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
This should have been fixed in one of the recent nightly builds of NAntContrib However, very recent nightly builds of NantContrib failed because of changes to the NAnt documenter, but these should be fixed soon ... Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Dmitriy Bezugliy [EMAIL

Re: Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report

2003-10-28 Thread Gert Driesen
from NAnt (just did a new update from cvs too). Is there a way I can detect if mono did include ICU support? --- Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: D-Fuse [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug Report Date: Tue, 28

Re: [nant-dev] Bug with Solution Task - URI formats are not supported.

2003-11-01 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Phil, The issue you reported is fixed in cvs, but we could very well be dropping support for url references (web projects) in favor of using the WebMap collection to map these url's to local paths ... solution solutionfile=test.sln configuration=release webmap map

Re: [nant-dev] Criteria for next release

2003-11-02 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: John C Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Dev [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 5:45 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Criteria for next release Now that I have access to an account that can post successfully to the list, I think we should decide on

Re: [nant-dev] solution task bug in nested build

2003-11-04 Thread Gert Driesen
What version of NAnt are you using ? This should actually already be fixed in the 0.8.4 nightly builds, but not by that patch you supplied ... Earlier versions of the solution task did not resolve the solution filename to a full path in SolutionTask.cs, this was fixed since ... Can you try one

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt error!

2003-11-09 Thread Gert Driesen
Alex, This issue should be fixed in cvs. Can you try using the latest nightly build of NAnt (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Alex Farokhyans [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 9:18 PM Subject:

Re: [nant-dev] internal null reference

2003-11-09 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Steve, Lots of bugs have been fixed in the solution task since the 0.8.3 release. Can you try using the latest nightly build of NAnt (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) and report back ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Breeser, Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] Bug report

2003-11-09 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Rune, The in attribute does not support wildcards, so you should actually use the nested in element and its items fileset : target name=init description=Initializes the build. foreach item=Line delim=, property=name,value in items includes name=**/*.properties / /items

Re: [nant-dev] contributing unit tests

2003-11-16 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Michael Aird [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 5:21 PM Subject: [nant-dev] contributing unit tests I'd like to contribute to the project and i figured the best way to get started was by contributing some unit tests...

Re: [nant-dev] echo proposal: sync w/ Ant

2003-11-20 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 8:23 PM Subject: [nant-dev] echo proposal: sync w/ Ant Anyone offended if I sync up the echo task with the Ant echo task, allowing it to

Re: [nant-dev] revised TouchTaskTest.cs

2003-11-20 Thread Gert Driesen
I committed both patches and re-enabled the testers in our test suite. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: Michael Aird [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Michael Aird' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 21, 2003 4:54 AM Subject: [nant-dev] revised TouchTaskTest.cs

Re: [nant-dev] localised resources

2003-11-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Damir, Can you verify whether this is working fine in the latest nightly build ? Thanks, Gert On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 15:30, Ian MacLean wrote: Damir Simunic wrote: Hi Damir, I'm just back from vacation and catching up on email. I'll take a look at this and get it working for non resx

Re: [nant-dev] solution task and linked VS.Net files.

2003-11-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Kirk, This should be fixed in cvs, and in the nightly builds. Are you using NAnt 0.8.3 ? Can you try a recent nighlty build (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) and get back to us ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Viehland, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] nant 0.8.3 release - bug in documentation

2003-11-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Dmitry, This is fixed in recent nightly builds. Thanks for the report, Gert - Original Message - From: Dmitry Sapunov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:54 PM Subject: [nant-dev] nant 0.8.3 release - bug in documentation Documentation file

Re: [nant-dev] nunit2 uses obsolete version of NUnit 2.1

2003-11-24 Thread Gert Driesen
This should be fixed in recent nightly builds (http://nant.sourceforge.net/nightly/builds) ? Can you let us know if that fixed your problem ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Wojciech Ziembla [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 7:41 AM

Re: [nant-dev] csc /lib parameter handling

2003-11-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Yevgeniy, I added support for the /lib(path) option using fileset support, meaning that you're now able to use the following build syntax in all compiler tasks (csc, vbc, vjc, jsc) : csc ... sources ... /sources lib basedir=... includes name=... / /lib /csc

Re: [nant-dev] csc /lib parameter handling

2003-11-24 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 1:40 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] csc /lib parameter handling I was thinking much the same thing. If we did that we would

Re: [nant-dev] Minor NAnt output bug.

2003-11-25 Thread Gert Driesen
Nick, This is now fixed in cvs. Thanks for the report, Gert - Original Message - From: Nick Varacalli [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 4:44 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Minor NAnt output bug. Using the Oct 31st, 2003 nightly build. After the total

[nant-dev] 0.8.4 Beta

2003-11-26 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I'd like to ensure that the release notes for both NAnt and NAntContrib are complete. Can everyone that contributed code to NAnt and NAntContrib since the 0.8.3 release double-check whether the release notes (/doc/releasenotes.html in NAnt/NAntContrib cvs or /releasenotes.html on the NAnt

Re: [nant-dev] fail task behavior and nant.onfailure

2003-11-30 Thread Gert Driesen
Damir, These issues are now fixed in cvs. Thanks for taking the time to get to the bottom of this, and providing the repros ! Gert - Original Message - From: Damir Simunic [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2003 8:58 PM Subject: [nant-dev] fail task

Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator for NAnt

2003-12-03 Thread Gert Driesen
I actually still prefer using the ${foo} syntax as : - its easier to distinguish properties (as Ian originally said) - it won't break compatibility for properties with numeric names (eg ${123}) - corresponds with the MSbuild implementation. (not that this is importantà - XSLT also uses a ($)

Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator for NAnt

2003-12-03 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 3:01 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator

Re: [nant-dev] Expression Evaluator in CVS

2003-12-03 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:24 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Expression Evaluator in CVS Hi! I've committed expression evaluator (as in test1 release) to CVS in EE-patches branch. I think what

Re: [nant-dev] Re: verbosity of some tasks

2003-12-04 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Matthew Mastracci [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:44 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: verbosity of some tasks At some point I'd like to use the multiple .resx input of resgen.exe - it would be

Re: [nant-dev] Re: verbosity of some tasks

2003-12-04 Thread Gert Driesen
PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:48 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Re: verbosity of some tasks Sorry! That was a think-o on my part. I meant resource code. Should have read: It would be nice to move the *resource* code

Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator for NAnt

2003-12-05 Thread Gert Driesen
]; Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: Expression evaluator for NAnt One more think came to my mind: Dash (-) is a legal character in property name today and this may cause

Re: [nant-dev] Ant's team reaction to msbuild

2003-12-07 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 7:46 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Ant's team reaction to msbuild FYI : the Mono team is planning to implement MSBuild support in the next 4-6

Re: [nant-dev] Ant's team reaction to msbuild

2003-12-08 Thread Gert Driesen
http://www.go-mono.com/mono-todo.htm - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:19 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Ant's team reaction to msbuild Where did you find that bit of info

Re: [nant-dev] Naming of documentation files

2003-12-09 Thread Gert Driesen
would be great if we could use the NAntDocumenter to generate docs for the functions if possible ... that's the only way to ensure that the docs are always in sync ... Gert - Original Message - From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003

Re: [nant-dev] Naming of documentation files

2003-12-10 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 3:30 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Naming of documentation files Good work on the userdoc stuff for functions Jarek. I just built after

Re: [nant-dev] Nant Bug?

2003-12-12 Thread Gert Driesen
Title: Nant Bug? Erv, This issue has been reported before and will be fixed in the next rc. Gert - Original Message - From: Erv Walter To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:22 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Nant Bug? One of my team members

Re: [nant-dev] Nant Bug?

2003-12-12 Thread Gert Driesen
Title: Nant Bug? no problem, thanks for the detailed report Gert - Original Message - From: Erv Walter To: Gert Driesen ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 5:49 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Nant Bug? Oops. Sorry for not following

Re: [nant-dev] Unable to build NAnt 0.85 on Linux

2003-12-13 Thread Gert Driesen
Giuseppe, I can't reproduce this on my gentoo box right here but I think its a bug in Mono, as it was reported by others too ... The following code apparently results in an ArgumentException : using System.Globalization; class Test { static void Main() {

Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task

2003-12-14 Thread Gert Driesen
start-rant Guess this will be the start of many dilemma's ... I'm pretty sure there will always be people that prefer xml build elements only, and actually that's also one of my concerns ... I'd hate to see build files reduced to large chunks of scripts ... As long as we allow build authors to

Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task

2003-12-14 Thread Gert Driesen
don't (ab)use it for just about everything, and don't offer users any alternatives ... Tasks should offer functionality on a much higher level than functions ... Gert - Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ian MacLean [EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task

2003-12-14 Thread Gert Driesen
to dive in as well ... - Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; William E Caputo [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 3:08 PM Subject: Re: [nant

Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task

2003-12-15 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 4:10 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] SUBMISSION: Path Task Yeah, And now we have

Re: [nant-dev] Will there be a nAnt-0.84rc2 and final before the end of the year?

2003-12-18 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Scott Hernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Morris, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Will there be a nAnt-0.84rc2 and final before the end of the year? There will

[nant-dev] NAnt 0.84 Release Candidate 2 available

2003-12-21 Thread Gert Driesen
NAnt 0.84 Release Candidate 2 is now available for download at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=31650 For a list of changes, see http://nant.sourceforge.net/releasenotes.html. The NAnt Team --- This SF.net email is

Re: [nant-dev] Build file broke from RC1-RC2

2003-12-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Erick, Thanks for reporting this issue. I will make sure its fixed for the 0.84 release ... Gert - Original Message - From: Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NAnt developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:41 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Build file broke

[nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82

2003-12-25 Thread Gert Driesen
This issue could be due to a known issue in rc1, can you please try rc2 and get back to us asap ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Abhishek Kant [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 25, 2003 3:46 PM Subject: [Nant-users] Problem

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Problem installing nant v82

2003-12-26 Thread Gert Driesen
... Good thing you noticed this now ... Sorry for this Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 26, 2003 7:03 AM Subject: Re: [nant

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >