rs (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 1:00 AM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final
Well, this is just an opinion: If you find a library that is already
built and (probably more importantly) supported then your task will have
the benefit of any bug fixes/ imp
Thompson
Sent: Tue 9/9/2003 2:40 PM
To: NAnt developers (E-mail)
Cc:
Subject:RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final
If I just wrap a library, that introduces a dependency into NAnt. Is
this ok to do?
Erick
> -Original Message-
> From: Clayton Harbour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I just wrap a library, that introduces a dependency into NAnt. Is
this ok to do?
Erick
> -Original Message-
> From: Clayton Harbour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 7:24 AM
> To: Erick Thompson; NAnt developers (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: [
Clayton Harbour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Erick Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "NAnt developers (E-mail)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] 0.8.3 final
First, I think an ftp task would be great!
>At
First, I think an ftp task would be great!
>At the moment, I'm looking for a open source C# FTP client I can
liberally
>copy and paste from.
I did a quick Google and came up with the following:
http://www.enterprisedt.com/downloads/csftp/csftp.html
I haven't had time to look at it but I
> -Original Message-
> > I tend to agree with you. Corporate users don't really gel with the
> > opensource style 0.x release numbers. Lets table up a list
> of things to
> > target at a 1.0 and see how that looks.
>
> Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree
> with
Martin Aliger wrote:
Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree with Sascha.
1/ 1.0 should contains VS.NET addin. Or maybe all NAntContrib?
sure - the addin exists but it needs some love. Volunteers amyone ?
2/ definitelly * ensure documentation is complete
of course.
3/
> I tend to agree with you. Corporate users don't really gel with the
> opensource style 0.x release numbers. Lets table up a list of things to
> target at a 1.0 and see how that looks.
Right :) As I'm corporate developer as well, I mostly agree with Sascha.
1/ 1.0 should contains VS.NET addin.
