Clayton was wondering if we could use References inside NAnt, and
Gump write a pre-defined include file [it does something
similar when
it run Maven]. Does this idea have legs? Will it work for
compiles and
tests?
I don't think it would work for tests. Can you specify the
path
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the answer is 'who decides what is the right approach', and
I feel it is the NAnt team.
Yes, I agree. We may need to explain in more detail what we want to
do and why we want to do that with Gump, but we need the expertize
BTW: Ought we attempt to contribute metadata for the mini-nant up to
nant projects (including log4net, etc.) and see if we can get that
working from within Gump? I think that makes a good first goal.
I don't understand that, sorry. Are you asking whether we should try
log4net first once
The script would need to know which framework you intend to use. For
the Bourne shell script this simply means something like
#!/bin/sh
mono bin/NAnt.exe
(ignoring Rotor and DotGNU for now) but the Windows batch file is a
different beast.
We could set a Gump parameter in the workspace
: Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2004 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt and Gump -- getting closer...
The script would need to know which framework you intend to use. For
the Bourne shell
I don't know exactly what you're trying to achieve with Gump, but IMO
things
are much easier than you think if you fully utilize NAnt's potential.
Yeah, I think we need to step back and make that clear.
Gump is attempting to emulate a rabid OSS developer, perform the steps a
developer would
