Re: [nant-dev] Next release

2003-02-10 Thread Gert Driesen
Would it be possible to include support for building .NET Compact Framework assemblies in the release ? You should also be able to choose which .NET runtime you want to compile against. Is this currently possible ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Cort Schaefer [EMAIL

[nant-dev] building assemblies for multiple .NET framework runtimes

2003-02-11 Thread Gert Driesen
assemblies). Will support for building assemblies for multiple platforms be incorporated in nant ? Thanks, Gert Driesen

[nant-dev] preparing log4net to support multiple runtimes

2003-02-12 Thread Gert . Driesen
Hi, Apparently it's currently not necessary to build separate assemblies for the Windows CE and PocketPC .NET Compact Framework platforms, but I still think that we should provide different assemblies (or take into account that this is necessary in the near future) for both platforms, even if

Re: [nant-dev] serious BUGS in current CVS version !!

2003-02-15 Thread Gert Driesen
these misunderstandings. I would be glad to help you out on this, and other things ... Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:53 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] serious BUGS

[nant-dev] Delete task behaviour

2003-02-18 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, In my opinion the current behaviour of the delete task is not valid. It current throws an exception (which causes the build to fail if failonerror=true) when the file or directory that you want to delete doesn't exist. If you want to delete a directory or file that doesn't exist, then this

Re: [nant-dev] Delete task behaviour

2003-02-19 Thread Gert . Driesen
Hi Ian, If you want to delete a directory or file that doesn't exist, then this should just be considered a successful execution of the task, shouldn't it be ? yep. And it will work that way for filesets I think. Ok, I'll update the Delete task to do the same. Certainly if

Re: [nant-dev] Delete task behaviour

2003-02-19 Thread Gert . Driesen
Hi Gerry, responses inline - Original Message - From: Gerry Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:39 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Delete task behaviour What happens if you have directory foo that you want

[nant-dev] Delete task patch

2003-02-19 Thread Gert Driesen
I updated the Delete task with the proposed behaviour : - A BuildException is no longer thrown when you try to delete a file or directory that doesn't exist - A quiet attribute was added to the task : If the specified file or directory does not exist, do not display a diagnostic message or

[nant-dev] Delete task patch

2003-02-20 Thread Gert . Driesen
Hi IAn, I've removed the quiet attribute and made sure that a message wil be logged (in verbose mode) if you try to delete a file or directory that doesn't exist. Can you commit this patch (I updated the NUNit test for the Delete task too) ? Thanks, Gert (See attached file:

[nant-dev] Delete task final ...

2003-02-20 Thread Gert . Driesen
Hi, I agree that we should perhaps decide not to commit this patch at all ... But if the Delete task should continue to throw exceptions when you try to delete a non-existing file or directory, then indeed a new mechanism should be provided that allows you to check if a file or direftory

[nant-dev] Copy task bug ?

2003-02-21 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Currently the Copy task does not cause the build to fail when you try to copy a file that doesn't exist. If people want the build to failwhen you want to delete a file that doesn't exist then I'm pretty sure they want a build to fail (when failonerror = true) when you want to copy a

[nant-dev] Adding .NET Framework 1.1 as supported runtime ?

2003-02-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Would it be possible to change the NAnt.console.exe.config (in src/NAnt.Console), to allow it to run on the .NET Framework 1.1 runtime when both .NET Framework 1.0 and 1.1 are available on a system ? To accomplish this, the following should be added the config file : configuration

Re: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version of nant

2003-02-23 Thread Gert Driesen
. Then again, this is just my opinion :) -- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 10:01 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] .NET Framework 1.1 version

[nant-dev] Add property for retrieving program files location ?

2003-02-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Is it ok if I submit a patch to the SysInfo task that allows you to retrieve the location of the Program Files directory ? Thanks, Gert

[nant-dev] Patch for Copy task bug

2003-02-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Can anyone submit this patch for the following bug in the Copy task : when you try to copy a file that doesn't exsit, only an informative message is displayed in the log. In my opinion, this should definitely throw a BuildException (which, in turn, will cause the build to fail when

Re: [nant-dev] Add property for retrieving program files location ?

2003-02-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Scott, Can you submit this (very simple) patch ? Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Scott Hernandez To: Gert Driesen ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 6:47 PM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Add property for retrieving program files

[nant-dev] Delete task limit

2003-02-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Would it be possible to remove the path length must be 10 limit from the Delete task ? The following code in the DeleteTask.cs file causes this limit : // TODO: remove this once this task is fully tested and NAnt is at 1.0 if (path.Length = 10) { throw new

[nant-dev] multiple runtime support

2003-02-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I'm sorry for crossposting to both the users and developers list, but I think this is something that needs everyone's attention. In my opinion we urgently need to come up with a strategy for implementing support for multiple runtimes, and for making tasks runtime-aware. The release of

[nant-dev] Compiling for Mono

2003-02-28 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I'm trying to build a assemby using Mono 0.20 on Windows, but apparently the Mcs task calls the mcs.exe, this will cause Mono to compile an assembly using the .NET runtime instead of the Mono runtime. The task should instead call "mono mcs.exe [options]" where mcs.exe should be

Re: [nant-dev] Compiling for Mono

2003-02-28 Thread Gert Driesen
responses inline ... - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2003 3:16 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Compiling for Mono Gert Driesen wrote: I'm trying to build a assemby using Mono 0.20

[nant-dev] Available task

2003-03-03 Thread Gert Driesen
to the Free Software // Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA // Gert Driesen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) using System; using System.IO; using System.Globalization; using NUnit.Framework; using SourceForge.NAnt.Tasks; //using SourceForge.NAnt.Attributes; namespace

[nant-dev] runtime support for .NET CF ?

2003-03-04 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Ian, Thanks for implementing support for multiple runtimes, but I had still have issues if I want to use it for building assemblies for the .NET Compact Framework. The following is an example of what a configuration section for the .NET Compact Framework could look like :

[nant-dev] runtime support - framework names

2003-03-04 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Would it be possible to set the names of frameworks to all lower-case letters (or make the lookup case-insensitive) ? eg. net-1.0 instead of NET-1.0 This will improve consistency (mono is all lowercase)and will prevent me from having to changethe runtime identifiersin all my build

[nant-dev] PATCH csc task : add support for unsafe and checked options

2003-03-04 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I included a patch that adds support for the checked and unsafe options to the csc task. Can this please be committed ? Thanks, Gert CscTask.diff Description: Binary data

[nant-dev] PATCH Available task: support for frameworks

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Can the folowing patches please be committed : - added support for checking a specified framework is available to the available task eg. available type="Framework" resource="mono-0.21" property="mono-0.21.framework.present" / - updated the xml docs for the available task + use

Re: [nant-dev] proposal : change to if task behaviour

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
I agree with the way it's working right now, I didn't know that it was possible to use an ANd operation using the if task, my mistake sorry. Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Philip Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:55 PM Subject:

[nant-dev] PATCH for making NAnt.Core CLSCompliant

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I created a patch that will make NAnt.Core CLSCompliant and that will no longer mae NAnt visible to COM clients (which I don't think is necessary anyway). I'm not saying it should be committed, but I think we should be moving in this direction. So I hope itwill at least get the

[nant-dev] PATCH : expose frameworkinfo version as property

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, This patch exposes the version of the CurrentFramework and the DefaultFramework as properties. Can this please be committed ? Thanks, Gert Project.diff Description: Binary data

[nant-dev] Updated PATCH for making NAnt.Core CLSCompliant

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I forgot to add a few patches, so here's the complete list of patches. Thanks, Gert FileSet.diff Description: Binary data IfTask.diff Description: Binary data Log.diff Description: Binary data Target.diff Description: Binary data TaskContainer.diff Description: Binary data

Re: [nant-dev] PATCH for making NAnt.Core CLSCompliant

2003-03-06 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Ian, Does that mean that you'll commit the patch (with the exception of setting the ComVisible attribute) ? Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:37 AM Subject: Re: [nant

[nant-dev] Directoryscanner issue ?

2003-03-10 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I'm having problems building nant using the build file. Apparently the excludes are no longer functioning, because the 'GetTaskTest.cs', the 'MailTaskTest.cs' andthe 'TouchTaskTest.cs' are being excluded in the buildfile, but they still get passed to the compiler anyway. I've

Re: [nant-dev] Formatting, #Regions, and CVS Keywords

2003-03-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Title: Message Or perhaps we can start porting http://checkstyle.sourceforge.net/to .NET :-) - Original Message - From: Jeff McManus To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Formatting, #Regions, and CVS Keywords

Re: [nant-dev] multiple framework support for vbc task

2003-03-29 Thread Gert Driesen
. I have not yet managed to build a MonoBasic application using nant because it expects the commandline options to be specified using -- instead of / Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March

Re: [nant-dev] multiple framework support for vbc task

2003-03-29 Thread Gert Driesen
to be specified using -- instead of / Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2003 9:20 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] multiple framework support for vbc task Gert Driesen wrote

[nant-dev] recursive includes

2003-03-30 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I want to create a hierarchy of included configuration files, where each level of the hierarchy adds information. eg. I want to have the following directory structure : examples mono 1.0 Tutorials WebApp in each directory I would want to have both a build file and a

[nant-dev] original exception is discarded

2003-04-01 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, When an ApplicationException (like BuildException) occurs in the ConsoleDriver.Main method, the cause of the exception (the innerexception) is not shown to the user. This means, for example, that when you specify a buildfile containing invalid xml, you'll only get the message "Error

Re: [nant-dev] original exception is discarded

2003-04-02 Thread Gert Driesen
may be a little verbose in places, but we can clean those up. Right now I would say it is better to have too much info, than not enough. This is will need to be addressed before the final (1.0) release. - Original Message - From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Scott Hernandez

Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility

2003-04-03 Thread Gert Driesen
Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 1:32 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] COM visibility It works both ways. If you feel that there is no demand for using NAnt from COM

Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib

2003-06-07 Thread Gert Driesen
Great job, Clayton ... I only have two minor concerns : - should we have a more general name for the namespace for scm related tasks (and have a subnamespace for cvs ?), so we can add more scm tasks later on (eg. for sourcesafe, pvcs, ...) ? - Can't these tasks actually be part of #cvslib itself

Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib

2003-06-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:28 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib Gert Driesen wrote: Great job, Clayton

Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib

2003-06-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 11:39 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib of course but we're not talking every

Re: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib

2003-06-08 Thread Gert Driesen
- From: Clayton Harbour [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 7:42 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Nant cvs task using sharpcvslib Hi, I think that a nant task should live in nant. It gives the nant

Re: [nant-dev] FW: Upcoming 0.8.3 release

2003-06-25 Thread Gert Driesen
I John, I never had any issues with these tests, can you possible debug the tests to see what's actually happening ? I would still like to get a few things in the 0.8.3 release : upgrade to a new version of #cvslib, perhaps upgrade to a yet-to-be-released version of log4net (which now uses the

Re: [nant-dev] FW: Upcoming 0.8.3 release

2003-06-26 Thread Gert Driesen
John, We should .. euhm .. could ... (never say should, if there's a slight chance that Ian is gonna read the mail .. LOL) also move to a fixed version number for releases, now that all assemblies are built using a common assemblyinfo.cs file. I'll set a fixed version in

[nant-dev] default framework

2003-06-27 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Ian, Sorry to bring this up again but if we decide to remove the defaultframework attribute from the NAnt configuration file, and have NAnt automatically select the first valid framework as default framework, then shouldn't we add an attribute on the project level that allows you to set a

Re: [nant-dev] default framework

2003-06-27 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 8:29 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] default framework Gert Driesen wrote: Hi Ian, Sorry to bring this up again but if we decide to remove the defaultframework

Re: [nant-dev] Problem with the resgen task on Linux

2003-06-28 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Giuseppe, I looked at the code of the resgen task, and apparently it's not being executed on the mono runtime right now. The following comment is in the UsesRuntimeEngine property : // TO-DO : uncomment this when monoresgen no longer crashes when run with the mono runtime. I think that

Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib tolatest Nant)

2003-06-28 Thread Gert Driesen
How do you propose to deal with the NAntContrib sources ? will they be moved into /src/NAnt.Optional and /tests/NAnt.Optional or will they be integrated into the current namespace structure ? I would still like to get rid of needing a COM interop assembly for SourceSafe (and if possible also for

Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

2003-06-29 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Miller, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:10 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant

Re: [nant-dev] Namespaces and NAnt.Cnntrib tasks

2003-06-29 Thread Gert Driesen
Looks pretty much ok, some minor comments/questions inline ... - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:56 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Namespaces and NAnt.Cnntrib tasks Gert Driesen wrote

Re: [nant-dev] VSSGET unknown task?

2003-06-30 Thread Gert Driesen
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 17:51, Ramasamy, Dinesh wrote: Hi I get the following error, SourceForge.NAnt.BuildException: H:\work\build.xml(10,3): Unknown task vssget at SourceForge.NAnt.TaskFactory.CreateTask(XmlNode taskNode, Project proj) at

Re: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures

2003-06-30 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 6:54 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures I'm still getting build failures for the *entire* Nant.VisualCpp test suite on the 1.1

Re: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures

2003-07-01 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 7:48 AM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] Nant.VisualCpp.Tasks build failures Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

[nant-dev] NDoc 1.2 !!

2003-07-02 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I just installed the new NDoc 1.2 beta, and wow am I impressed .. I think the speed increase for the MSDN documenter is at least x5. You can now choose whether you want links to .NET SDK 1.0, 1.1 and MSDN Online, and the MSDN documenter now allows you to generate online (web) docs ... We

[nant-dev] onsuccess / failure

2003-07-03 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, Is it ok to rename the properties that designates a target to execute when the build fails from nant.failure to nant.onfailure, to have it in sync with nant.onsuccess ? I know this is a breaking change, so we should document it as such in the release notes. In my opinion, changes like these

Re: [nant-dev] Branch for 0.8.3.xxx release

2003-07-03 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi John, I've created a branch and named it BRANCH-083, as a tag has to start with a letter and cannot contain dots. Gert On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 03:46, John Barstow wrote: Now that we have a cleanly building code base, can someone with CVS write access create a branch for the 0.8.3 release?

Re: [nant-dev] Branch for 0.8.3.xxx release

2003-07-03 Thread Gert Driesen
I forgot : I'll increment the version number later today ... what version number do you recommend, 0.8.4. ? what was actually decided after the discussion on this subject ? John, will you assign a fixed (0.8.3.x) version number to the 0.8.3 branch before building the release ? will

Re: [nant-dev] onsuccess / failure

2003-07-03 Thread Gert Driesen
It will output a warning if it's still used, and will continue to actually use it for now. - Original Message - From: Bernard Vander Beken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 8:45 AM Subject: RE

Re: [nant-dev] How far are we with the nunit2 task on Linux?

2003-07-07 Thread Gert Driesen
I haven't really tried NUNit on mono yet. Perhaps you should ask both the NUnit team and the Mono team if there are known issues with NUnit on Mono, and if these will be resolves in NUNit 2.1 (which has been postponed several times). I assume there was a good reason for the Mono developers to

[nant-dev] CvsTask unit tests

2003-07-08 Thread Gert Driesen
Clayton, Can you look into the issues with the unit tests for the cvs tasks ? We've been having lots of problems with these unit tests, should we perhaps set the HaltOnError to false for now for these tests ? That we can at least get the nightly build up and running again ... GErt

[nant-dev] Re: CvsTask unit tests

2003-07-08 Thread Gert Driesen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:10 PM Subject: RE: CvsTask unit tests Hi Gert, I am not sure what you mean. I did some work about 2 weeks ago to get these running, which involved pointing

[nant-dev] NAnt version number

2003-07-10 Thread Gert Driesen
John, I'm not sure about this, but wasn't it the intention to using the following version numbering scheme : major.minor.revision.YMMDD eg. 0.8.3.30710 (if a release would be built today) ? Or do you have another proposal ? Are we currently keeping track of the version numbers (the revision

Re: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number

2003-07-11 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: John Barstow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 3:50 AM Subject: [nant-dev] RE: NAnt version number Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure

Re: [nant-dev] Nightly builds

2003-06-30 Thread Gert Driesen
If no one else volunteers, I'll look into it. On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 21:07, Geurts, James wrote: Hey everyone. I'm sorry that I have not been able to get this working. I have been too busy lately and do not see myself having the time to get it working properly any time soon. If someone

Re: [nant-dev] support of libpath option for vbc task/commit access to CVS DB

2003-07-17 Thread Gert Driesen
as the libpath is a semi-colon delimited list of directories, you should perhaps consider using a FileSet instead of a string property. Just to make sure we do it right from the start. Gert - Original Message - From: David Keber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

Re: [nant-dev] [0.8.3] RC2 build failure

2003-07-28 Thread Gert Driesen
I did make some changes to the build process on the main branch in order to better support third party libraries (for multiple framework versions). Apparently you've committed the NAnt.VSNet.build from the main branch to the 0.8.3 branch. Gert - Original Message - From: Matthew

Re: [nant-dev] 0.8.3-rc2 missing Linux dlls

2003-08-01 Thread Gert Driesen
The lib directory changes are not in the 0.8.3 branch, these will become available in the 0.8.4 version. I suggest building NAnt from cvs on Linux, which is quite easy : just execute make clean make all in the NAnt root directory. However you should make sure that you've built Mono from cvs

Re: [nant-dev] Re: [Nant-users] Idea: task ... message=hello world /

2003-08-01 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, I don't think I really like adding a message attribute to the Task class, and having two ways of outputting messages to the build log. The echo task is more powerful as it allows messages to be output only when a condition is met (separate from the task conditions), and it allows you to set

Re: [nant-dev] FxCop RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Arjen, Good to see someone finally took the time to implement these tasks, great work However, I'm not sure the FxCop task is very useful as you've implemented it, but I could be wrong ofcourse ... I think we could actually start from an existing FxCop project file as it doesn't make sense to

Re: [nant-dev] P.S. to last message

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi, This issue is now fixed in cvs. Thanks for reporting this. Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Horn, Julian [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 5:09 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] P.S. to last message Julian, I

RE: [nant-dev] FxCop RegSvcs Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
of these rules are just guidelines that could and in some cases actually should be ignored. Gert Best, Arjen -Original Message- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:42 PM To: Arjen Poutsma; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] FxCop

Re: [nant-dev] FxCop Tasks

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Name=$(FxCopDir)\Rules\PerformanceRules.dll Enabled=True AllRulesEnabled=True / /RuleFiles as you can see, you can't just use a fileset for the targets unless you always want all types to be analyzed ... Gert - Original Message - From: Arjen Poutsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen

Re: [nant-dev] Daily build

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jarek, Normally the daily builds are produced using an automated build server (using Draco.NET), however we've been having issues for some time now but we hope to have these resolved as soon as possible (Scott, please ???). Thanks, Gert - Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski

Re: [nant-dev] RegSvcs Task

2003-08-14 Thread Gert Driesen
Thanks Arjen, I'll commit it later (today?) with some minor adjustments. Gert - Original Message - From: Arjen Poutsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 10:14 AM Subject: [nant-dev] RegSvcs Task Hi, Attached to this file is the RevSvcs task. This

Re: [nant-dev] IncludeTask / failonerror

2003-08-15 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Brant, The IncludeTask already supports failonerror, as support for failonerror is implemented in the Task base class. I did make some minor modifications just now that will make it more clear as to what is causing the include task to fail. Ian, should we allow a file to be included twice

Re: [nant-dev] Contributing

2003-08-16 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Tom, I'll look into committing your patch later today. I'll probable change your WebMap class to be a strongly typed collection, and remove your WebMapAttribute class as I don't see any added value in that. Keep the patches coming !! Gert - Original Message - From: Tom Cabanski

Re: [nant-dev] PATCH: New attribute to exec task.

2003-08-17 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jaroslaw, I've added this attribute now. That was my intention anyway, so thanks for reporting this. Gert - Original Message - From: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2003 11:38 PM Subject: [nant-dev] PATCH: New

Re: [nant-dev] if uptodatefile

2003-08-17 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jaroslaw, In my opinion the docs are correct, which means both the implementation and the testers are wrong. I fixed this issue and the testers locally, but I'm not sure if I can commit them as these changes would break backwards compatibily. But I still think we should fix the issue and

Re: [nant-dev] if uptodatefile

2003-08-18 Thread Gert Driesen
Ian, Is it ok to commit my local changes, then ? Gert - Original Message - From: Anthony LoveFrancisco [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Ian MacLean' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Gert Driesen' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: 'Jaroslaw Kowalski' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'NAnt Developers' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday

[nant-dev] general practice for attribute names

2003-08-18 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Ian, What's the general practice for attribute names regarding case ? Should new properties always be lowercase or should we also use mixed-case properties ? If we can also use mixed-case properties, then I assume the first letter should be lower-case (camel case), right ? for example, I

[nant-dev] Re: general practice for attribute names

2003-08-18 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:17 PM Subject: Re: general practice for attribute names I'm fairly sure that we had agreed on lower case

Re: [nant-dev] Re: general practice for attribute names

2003-08-18 Thread Gert Driesen
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:18 PM To: Gert Driesen Cc: Nant-Developers (E-Mail) Subject: [nant-dev] Re: general practice for attribute names I'm fairly sure that we had agreed on lower case for the build file. useRuntimeEngine is more readable but now you have to work out

Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config

2003-08-20 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Yogesh, The test element has a appconfig attribute that can be used to set the application configuration file that should be used. Gert - Original Message - From: Yogesh Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 4:33 PM Subject: [nant-dev] NUnit

Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config

2003-08-21 Thread Gert Driesen
] NUnit Config Thx... is this attribute documented... i may have overlooked it... From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Yogesh Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:05:20 +0200 Hi Yogesh, The test element has

[nant-dev] Re: Patch for Solution task

2003-08-21 Thread Gert Driesen
Patch was applied. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:37 PM Subject: Patch for Solution task Gert, thanks for applying my first patch. After examining your

Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config

2003-08-22 Thread Gert Driesen
: [nant-dev] NUnit Config Thx... is this attribute documented... i may have overlooked it... From: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Yogesh Shetty [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NUnit Config Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 18:05:20 +0200 Hi Yogesh, The test

Re: [nant-dev] NUnit2Task Default Formatter

2003-08-22 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jasper, I'm not sure if this is the correct fix for this issue ... I'd rather remove the default formatter altogether, but that would break backward compatibility. But if we can correct wrong behaviour, we should do it as soon as possible ... Ian, what do you think ? Gert - Original

Re: [nant-dev] NUnit2Task Default Formatter

2003-08-23 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Jasper, I've updated the nunit2 task (in CVS) to only add a default plain-text formatter if no other formatters were specified. In that case, I also output the following warning message : No formatter .../ element was specified. A plain-text formatter was added to prevent loosing output of

Re: [nant-dev] solution task fixes

2003-08-24 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Eddie, I've committed your patches to cvs. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: Eddie Tse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 3:58 PM Subject: [nant-dev] solution task fixes Hi All, I've been experimenting with the solution task from CVS

Re: [nant-dev] Patch for Solution Task

2003-08-24 Thread Gert Driesen
I submitted your patch to cvs. Keep'em coming :-) Gert - Original Message - From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 4:04 PM Subject: [nant-dev] Patch for Solution Task Solution task sometimes puts two dots in resource names where there

Re: [nant-dev] BUG: incorrect output of resgen

2003-08-26 Thread Gert Driesen
I can't recall why I changed it ... I've reverted my changes for now. Sorry for the hassle it caused. Gert - Original Message - From: Erv Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED]; NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday

Re: [nant-dev] Fw: two more problems in Solution task (path related)

2003-08-26 Thread Gert Driesen
These should be fixed in cvs now. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 10:46 AM Subject: [nant-dev] Fw: two more problems in Solution task (path related) Hi again, I found two more

Re: [nant-dev] solution task

2003-08-27 Thread Gert Driesen
This is now fixed in cvs. Thanks ! Gert - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 2:15 PM Subject: [nant-dev] solution task Hi, recent outputdir addon is missing this (second constructor) ---

Re: [nant-dev] OT: anonymous cvs

2003-08-27 Thread Gert Driesen
sourceforge has been experiencing problems lately (actually its already quite a while), so anonymous cvs is running against the backup server. Gert - Original Message - From: Martin Aliger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: ! nant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 5:40 PM Subject:

Re: [nant-dev] Patch for solution task

2003-08-27 Thread Gert Driesen
Hi Tom, This has actually already been committed to cvs, but thanks for the patch anyway ... Gert PS. Would it be possible to include patches as attachments instead of having them inline ? - Original Message - From: Tom Cabanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [nant-dev] IIS Task

2003-08-28 Thread Gert Driesen
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:55 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] IIS Task -Original Message- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I think you should actually create a servicecontroller task that allows any service to be started, paused, continued

Re: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks

2003-08-28 Thread Gert Driesen
I'd rather move to the following task layout for the cvs tasks, but I haven't yet looked at implementing it : cvs cvsroot=... password=... update destination=... / checkout / /cvs if you get my point ... Gert - Original Message - From: brian.nantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [nant-dev] IIS Task

2003-08-28 Thread Gert Driesen
- From: Brian Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 7:16 PM Subject: RE: [nant-dev] IIS Task From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:00 AM Any reason why you used WMI and not the ServiceController class

Re: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks

2003-08-29 Thread Gert Driesen
: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: brian.nantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2003 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Subversion Tasks Really, What is the benefit of nesting everything under a cvs tag ? apart from having common

Re: [nant-dev] supportedRuntime in NAnt.exe.config

2003-08-30 Thread Gert Driesen
I did some tests and found no negative effects of doing this, so I submitted this change this cvs. Gert - Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jaroslaw Kowalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: NAnt Developers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 6:10 AM Subject:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >