Please review.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188082
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8188082/webrev.00/
PS. Piggybacking to push another sample to demonstrate the use of es6
tagged template literal to create a java object
Thanks,
-Sundar
+1
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Hannes Wallnöfer
> wrote:
>
> Please review:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186815
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8186815/webrev/
>
> Thanks,
> Hannes
+1
-Sundar
On 27/09/17, 8:14 PM, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
Please review:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186815
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8186815/webrev/
Thanks,
Hannes
Please review:
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8186815
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8186815/webrev/
Thanks,
Hannes
+1
Hannes
> Am 27.09.2017 um 14:07 schrieb Jim Laskey (Oracle) :
>
> +1
>
>> On Sep 27, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan
>> wrote:
>>
>> Please review.
>>
>> Bug:
+1
> On Sep 27, 2017, at 8:59 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan
> wrote:
>
> Please review.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188023
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8188023/webrev.00/index.html
>
> Piggybacking to take
Please review.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8188023
Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8188023/webrev.00/index.html
Piggybacking to take care of few javac warnings as well.
Thanks,
-Sundar
+1
> On 2017. Sep 26., at 19:05, Hannes Wallnöfer
> wrote:
>
> Please review:
>
> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8187962
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8187962/webrev/
>
> Thanks,
> Hannes
On 27/09/2017 7:26 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2017-09-27 10:55, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/09/2017 6:30 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The nashorn java code requires a somewhat convoluted compilation. As
a result, we use a special java compiler setup,
GENERATE_NEWBYTECODE_DEBUG. This
On 2017-09-27 10:55, David Holmes wrote:
On 27/09/2017 6:30 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The nashorn java code requires a somewhat convoluted compilation. As
a result, we use a special java compiler setup,
GENERATE_NEWBYTECODE_DEBUG. This explicitly lists -source 9 -target
9, which
+1
On 27/09/17, 2:34 PM, Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
+1
Hannes
Am 27.09.2017 um 08:17 schrieb Priya Lakshmi
Muthuswamy:
Hi,
--patch-module actually works and added it to back to the testcase.
webrev :
+1
Hannes
> Am 27.09.2017 um 08:17 schrieb Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy
> :
>
> Hi,
>
> --patch-module actually works and added it to back to the testcase.
>
> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8133623/webrev.01/
>
> Thanks,
> Priya
>
> On
On 27/09/2017 6:30 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The nashorn java code requires a somewhat convoluted compilation. As a
result, we use a special java compiler setup,
GENERATE_NEWBYTECODE_DEBUG. This explicitly lists -source 9 -target 9,
which generates this warning:
warning: [options]
On 27.09.2017 10:30, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The nashorn java code requires a somewhat convoluted compilation. As a
result, we use a special java compiler setup,
GENERATE_NEWBYTECODE_DEBUG. This explicitly lists -source 9 -target 9,
which generates this warning:
warning: [options]
The nashorn java code requires a somewhat convoluted compilation. As a
result, we use a special java compiler setup,
GENERATE_NEWBYTECODE_DEBUG. This explicitly lists -source 9 -target 9,
which generates this warning:
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with
Hi,
--patch-module actually works and added it to back to the testcase.
webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~pmuthuswamy/8133623/webrev.01/
Thanks,
Priya
On 9/25/2017 11:17 AM, Priya Lakshmi Muthuswamy wrote:
Hi,
Please review JDK-8133623 : JDK-8055034.js and JDK-8130127.js fail in
nashorn
16 matches
Mail list logo