> +1
>
> Would it be possible to backport this to jdk8?
> On May 13, 2016 3:00 AM, "Sundararajan Athijegannathan" <
> sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On 5/13/2016 3:14 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
>&g
+1
Would it be possible to backport this to jdk8?
On May 13, 2016 3:00 AM, "Sundararajan Athijegannathan" <
sundararajan.athijegannat...@oracle.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On 5/13/2016 3:14 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
> > Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack
+1
On 5/13/2016 3:14 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
> Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display
> function names
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8156896/webrev/
>
> This makes it possible to reliably get the original function name from
>
+1
> On 13 May 2016, at 11:44, Hannes Wallnoefer
> wrote:
>
> Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display function
> names
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8156896/webrev/
>
> This makes it possible to reliably get the original functi
Review request for JDK-8156896: Script stack trace should display
function names
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~hannesw/8156896/webrev/
This makes it possible to reliably get the original function name from
Java method names for display in script stack traces. It replaces '$'
w
