Re: jjs and the tiny heap that couldn't

2016-08-26 Thread Claes Redestad
On 2016-08-26 05:01, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote: I don't think jjs was ever GC tuned! Most likely default copied/adapted from somewhere else! Please file a bug with your findings. Sure: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164848 PS. jjs of jdk9 is very different (in interac

Re: jjs and the tiny heap that couldn't

2016-08-25 Thread Sundararajan Athijegannathan
I don't think jjs was ever GC tuned! Most likely default copied/adapted from somewhere else! Please file a bug with your findings. PS. jjs of jdk9 is very different (in interactive mode) from that of jdk8u. jdk9 versions on jline+many other desktop stuff and so would load lot more code. Thanks,

jjs and the tiny heap that couldn't

2016-08-25 Thread Claes Redestad
Hi, as I was playing around with jjs to get some data points on recent indy bootstrap improvements when I noticed that the default heap size might be excessively small (linux x64 on a machine with 64G RAM): exit.js: exit(); jdk9/bin/jjs -J-Xlog:gc exit.js [0.026s][info][gc] Using G1 [0,246s][in