Re: Stand-alone Nashorn licensing

2020-10-15 Thread Attila Szegedi
I am not considering moving Nashorn to Apache. As to the why: I believe OpenJDK is a very robust open source organization with a good governance model. Nashorn already exists as a project in OpenJDK, and it was a natural choice to continue its development within its existing organization.

Re: Stand-alone Nashorn licensing

2020-10-14 Thread Attila Szegedi
Not sure what you mean by “derailed probe.” Are you saying in the past you tried to move Nashorn to the Apache Software Foundation? Or you tried to get Nashorn to be licensed under the Apache license? In any case, I’m not aware of any such past efforts. Attila. > On 2020. Oct 14., at 15:49,

Re: Stand-alone Nashorn licensing

2020-10-14 Thread Attila Szegedi
I’m talking with folks within Oracle about this topic. My assumption is that the code being lifted out of the jdk project doesn’t change its licensing, so it should continue to be GPL Version 2 with Classpath exception. A past example of a project similarly spun off from jdk was JavaFX and that

Stand-alone Nashorn licensing

2020-10-13 Thread BURRIS Thomas
Hi Attila (et. al.) - This is, indeed, good news. What specific license do you intend to release the stand-alone Nashorn under? After having been burnt by Oracle with the removal, it'd be very useful to know the targeted license. Best Regards, Thomas BURRIS RDF Modeling R Software