Re: JSObject without Java-based conversion to JSON

Where is it filed? Curious. We use Jackson and annotations to avoid circular references. On Sat, Apr 14, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Victor Polischuk wrote: > Hi Sundar, > > Thank you for the answer. I have filed a RFE #9053373, with the minimal > intrusion in the API which already

Re: JSObject without Java-based conversion to JSON

Hi Sundar, Thank you for the answer. I have filed a RFE #9053373, with the minimal intrusion in the API which already should allow people to work with Nashorn more comfortably. /Victor --- Original message --- From: "Sundararajan Athijegannathan"

Re: JSObject without Java-based conversion to JSON

Please note that a general Java object graph may involve circular references. Without modifying JSON somehow, it is not possible to handle such cases. That said, please do file a rfe with your ideas and we can discuss. -Sundar On 11/04/18, 10:18 AM, Victor Polischuk wrote: Dear all, I