You can do this, and you have access to OSX, i do not
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Am 04.04.2005 um 17:28 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached
implementation.
Great! Would you put this in or shoud I do it?
I have access to 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 Mac OSX
Yes, in my serve ri use threads extensively and i switched to normal
malloc becaus emy server was leaking very bad. It happens on new 2.6
kernel with latest glibc, on on RH 7.2 the same software was runing
fine. I do not use AS memory allocator anymore.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Hey friends,
w
On Apr 5, 2005 2:44 PM, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 05.04.2005 um 23:35 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
>
> > Fedora Core 3, 2.6.10 kernel, tcl 8.4.6. Looking at the tclConfig.sh,
> > it was compiled -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1.
> >
> > Is there anything weird about your build, 64bit, st
Am 05.04.2005 um 23:27 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
Should we be concerned about that last comment (Some error was
detected...)?
Hm... to answer that I'd have to read the stuff more carefully :-)
Maybe also look in the gnu implementation and compare the two.
Zoran
Am 05.04.2005 um 23:35 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
Fedora Core 3, 2.6.10 kernel, tcl 8.4.6. Looking at the tclConfig.sh,
it was compiled -DUSE_THREAD_ALLOC=1.
Is there anything weird about your build, 64bit, static, ...?
Nope. All standard, out-of-the-box. I'm using the 8.4.9 Tcl but
AFAIK, the
On Apr 5, 2005 2:25 PM, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 05.04.2005 um 23:21 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
>
> > In a fresh, empty server (make runtest) memory use doesn't climb at
> > all (2.8MB res, 17MB virt).
> >
> > Do you have any C modules loaded? Use ttrace?
>
> Nothing! Jus
On Apr 4, 2005 8:28 AM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached implementation.
>
> Stephen Deasey wrote:
> > I think OSX is the only poll() underachiever we care about.
> > Sourceforge has 10.1 and 10.2 hosts you can compile and test o
Am 05.04.2005 um 23:21 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
In a fresh, empty server (make runtest) memory use doesn't climb at
all (2.8MB res, 17MB virt).
Do you have any C modules loaded? Use ttrace?
Nothing! Just vanilla server. Have tried under Solaris. Same thing.
Then went and recompiled Tcl lib w/
In a fresh, empty server (make runtest) memory use doesn't climb at
all (2.8MB res, 17MB virt).
Do you have any C modules loaded? Use ttrace?
On Apr 5, 2005 1:19 PM, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey friends,
>
> would you mind putting this in your nscp session and observe the
Hey friends,
would you mind putting this in your nscp session and observe the virtual
memory usage (e.g. with the top utility) in a separate window?
time {set t [ns_thread begin "set a 1"]; ns_thread join $t} 1
I start with about 45MB server (startup) and end with 600MB after the
test
Am 04.04.2005 um 17:28 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached
implementation.
Great! Would you put this in or shoud I do it?
I have access to 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 Mac OSX (this is one of the most
important
platform for us, btw)...
Thanks you for find
11 matches
Mail list logo
