Am 11.04.2005 um 05:05 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
I guess this is an OSX problem? While looking at the configure tests,
I noticed that gethostbyname_r etc. are not used on Linux, even though
they're available. The standard call is thread safe, but only because
glibc puts a lock around everything.
I guess this is an OSX problem? While looking at the configure tests,
I noticed that gethostbyname_r etc. are not used on Linux, even though
they're available. The standard call is thread safe, but only because
glibc puts a lock around everything.
I wonder if for performance the *_r variants sho
I was hoping to make a release now-ish, mainly because I think the
cache and protocols stuff will be a little more destabilizing than the
changes made so far. It would simply provide a somewhat stable
baseline for use/testing while HEAD moves on.
I was going to call it 4.99.0, I wasn't going to m
On Apr 9, 2005 10:39 AM, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> zvpb:~/sf/naviserver/nsd zoran$ ./nsd -V
> NaviServer/4.0.10 (naviserver4_0)
> CVS Tag: $Name: $
> Built: Apr 9 2005 at 18:34:07
> Tcl version: 8.4
> Platform:osx
nsd/nsd.h:
Am 10.04.2005 um 03:05 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
Do we have any plans to release Naviserver?
IMHO, we still need to resolve nscache, virtual and protocol RFEs but
even without them Naviserver is very and looks much better than AS
already.
Not that i am competing but i am switching to NS whenever
