Am 30.07.2005 um 12:34 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
I just wonder if the system is too simple. In your example man page
you followed each ccall definition with a description. In the Tcl man
pages the definitions are grouped at the top, then the args are
described, then there's some prose text desc
On 7/30/05, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 30.07.2005 um 11:50 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
> >
> > Great. Are the macros expanded recursively? Can ccal output the type
> > declarations for the benefit of indexes etc.? Will we be able to
> > document the Tcl cmds as easily?
>
>
Am 30.07.2005 um 11:50 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
Great. Are the macros expanded recursively? Can ccal output the type
declarations for the benefit of indexes etc.? Will we be able to
document the Tcl cmds as easily?
I will first have to examine the TOC and index parts before I can
say somethi
On 7/30/05, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 30.07.2005 um 03:58 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
>
> >
> > [ccall [type int] Ns_ConnLocationAppend [type Ns_Conn] [arg *connPtr]
> > [type Ns_DString] [arg dest]]
> >
> > A C-call always has a name, always returns something (even if it's
>
Am 30.07.2005 um 03:58 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
[ccall [type int] Ns_ConnLocationAppend [type Ns_Conn] [arg *connPtr]
[type Ns_DString] [arg dest]]
A C-call always has a name, always returns something (even if it's
just void), all args are typed and named, etc., and a lot of that can
be inferre
