Re: [naviserver-devel] ns_atstartup and order of execution?

2005-10-19 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Thanks, I am slowly starting adjusting to local time and completing reading hundreds of emails i've got after more than 2 weeks without email and Internet. :-)) Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: Am 19.10.2005 um 19:46 schrieb Vlad Seryakov: I have no objections Hey! Welcome back! Zoran -

Re: [naviserver-devel] ns_atstartup and order of execution?

2005-10-19 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
Am 19.10.2005 um 19:46 schrieb Vlad Seryakov: I have no objections Hey! Welcome back! Zoran

Re: [naviserver-devel] ns_atstartup and order of execution?

2005-10-19 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I have no objections Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: Hi ! We have a pretty elaborate (and sometimes confusing) mechanism for running various atXXX scripts. So, if I would like to: ns_atstartup X ns_atstartup Y ns_atstartup Z then the server will execute: Z Y X i.e. in the *reverse* ord

[naviserver-devel] ns_cache

2005-10-19 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
Stephen, How is this going? Did you have any time to do some work on your improvements to the caching code? Cheers Zoran

[naviserver-devel] ns_atstartup and order of execution?

2005-10-19 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
Hi ! We have a pretty elaborate (and sometimes confusing) mechanism for running various atXXX scripts. So, if I would like to: ns_atstartup X ns_atstartup Y ns_atstartup Z then the server will execute: Z Y X i.e. in the *reverse* order. This is because all of those are just enter

[naviserver-devel] ns_moduleload confusion?

2005-10-19 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
Hi everybody! The new ns_moduleload command seems to add some confusion to what is being done on the virtual server/interp initialization, unfortunately. In the way it works now, modules are loaded from the virtual server initialization script. At that time the new ns_moduleload is used to load