Good news: The SF team read our thread and immediately started to go for
solutions :-)
Greetings,
You are receiving this mail because you are a project admin for
a SourceForge.net-hosted project. One of our primary services,
CVS, suffered a series of inter
I am not pushing, just expressed my frustration: in Feb more than a
week, now almost a week.
Let's see if this issue will popup again in couple of months.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
On 11.05.2006, at 19:01, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
But i would prefer naviserver be hosted on some third party system
On 11.05.2006, at 19:01, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
But i would prefer naviserver be hosted on some third party system
with full access and be able to run it as web server. We do not
need a lot of things: simple web pages, tracker/forum, mailing
list, wiki.
Vlad, WHO is going to maintain that
It's not obvious? One, OVERHEAD. Two, people lose interest, go away,
or just lack time. If those people happen to be the one's providing
or maintaining the servers, Bad Things can happen. It's better to
avoid those risks if you can.
Yes, this is true, but being public, everybody can copy the
> It's not obvious? One, OVERHEAD. Two, people lose interest, go away,
> or just lack time. If those people happen to be the one's providing
> or maintaining the servers, Bad Things can happen. It's better to
> avoid those risks if you can.
we had a similar talk when the naviserver fork was di
On 5/11/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11.05.2006, at 17:14, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
>
> In case it's useful, here's a list I wrote up a while back, it gives
> the names of various version control Ubuntu packages, all easily
> installable with apt-get. I planned to experime
On 11.05.2006, at 17:14, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
In case it's useful, here's a list I wrote up a while back, it gives
the names of various version control Ubuntu packages, all easily
installable with apt-get. I planned to experiment with each of these,
but haven't gotten around to it yet:
I'
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 09:47:11AM -0400, Vlad Seryakov wrote:
> What is the reason for NOT SELF-HOSTING Naviserver repository?
It's not obvious? One, OVERHEAD. Two, people lose interest, go away,
or just lack time. If those people happen to be the one's providing
or maintaining the servers, Ba
What is the reason for NOT SELF-HOSTING Naviserver repository?
Working with multiple hosting providers i can tell from my experience
that their solutions are not better or more reliable than well-thought
server setup that is installed in any datacenter. As SF shows, disk
failure can bring down
On Thu, May 11, 2006 at 07:48:37AM +0200, Bernd Eidenschink wrote:
> > > Is it worth considering alternative server, subversion maybe?
>
> with subversion, do you think of just changing from CVS to the revision
> control system "subversion" or to another server with CVS/subversion?
>
> Looks li
10 matches
Mail list logo
