On 7/22/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree, actually i have foreach command in OSSWEB and i do not know why
it is not included in to nstk, let me add it. Also, tell me if what kind
of functionality you would like to see in nstk without make it bloated
or big. I know it is very l
I agree, actually i have foreach command in OSSWEB and i do not know why
it is not included in to nstk, let me add it. Also, tell me if what kind
of functionality you would like to see in nstk without make it bloated
or big. I know it is very limited, that was the goal.
I am familiar with Open
On 7/22/06, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
nstk is quite old and i have not updated in for a long time.
Can you describe what was not pleasant and what was terrible, i may work
on that to improve it.
Vlad,
I am familiar with OpenACS database API. I am used to it. nstk is
very limi
nstk is quite old and i have not updated in for a long time.
Can you describe what was not pleasant and what was terrible, i may work
on that to improve it.
Mike wrote:
Right now I am
looking at 4 choices:
1) drop nsdb from naviserver and use nstcl after cleaning up any
multi-thread issues
2
My Fedora box has automake-1.4 automake-1.5 automake-1.6
automake-1.7 automake-1.9, but it also has plain 'automake', which is
the 1.9 version.
I guess we need something like:
$ AUTOMAKE="automake-1.9" ./autogen.sh
perhaps autogen.sh could be made to look for automake, then
automake-1.9, th
> Right now I am
> looking at 4 choices:
>
> 1) drop nsdb from naviserver and use nstcl after cleaning up any
> multi-thread issues
> 2) import ad_proc and 00-database from OACS and hack them up until
> they work. (unfortunately the combination of the two is not possible
> - nstcl ad_proc does no
