>> Zoran, just to make sure I got that right: xotcl does not work with the
>> nstrace/lazyloader at all (true or false). That's the reason I'm using
>> the modified init.tcl file from 4.99.1.
>
> I wonder if this is xotcl specific, or if xotcl just tickles the right
> (wrong) bit of code. Xotcl se
On 8/2/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> > Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> >
> >> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
> >> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
> >> it
Am 02.08.2007 um 20:27 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> Zoran, just to make sure I got that right: xotcl does not work with
> the
> nstrace/lazyloader at all (true or false). That's the reason I'm using
> the modified init.tcl file from 4.99.1.
>
Yes. The Xotcl loader might have some problems.
B
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
>
>> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
>> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
>> it should be fine for now.
>
> Hey... the Xotcl loader MIGHT be busted
Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
> it should be fine for now.
Hey... the Xotcl loader MIGHT be busted with lazyloader option set.
I wou
Stephen Deasey wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * For lazyloader=false, initialization seems ok but on first request I
>> get the usual problems mentioned in a previous thread (I had tried once
>> to debug those errors but it took me ages and it did not work out
