Am 11.04.2005 um 05:00 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
I was hoping to make a release now-ish, mainly because I think the
cache and protocols stuff will be a little more destabilizing than the
changes made so far. It would simply provide a somewhat stable
baseline for use/testing while HEAD moves on.
Regarding a final release, I agree a lot more needs to be done. The
protocols stuff would be a defining feature. Docs are required. If
we want other people to use it some kind of website will be needed,
too. I don't know how long any of this will take.
Also virtual hosting support will be a
Stephen Deasey wrote:
I was hoping to make a release now-ish, mainly because I think the
cache and protocols stuff will be a little more destabilizing than the
changes made so far. It would simply provide a somewhat stable
baseline for use/testing while HEAD moves on.
This is what i thought as
I was hoping to make a release now-ish, mainly because I think the
cache and protocols stuff will be a little more destabilizing than the
changes made so far. It would simply provide a somewhat stable
baseline for use/testing while HEAD moves on.
I was going to call it 4.99.0, I wasn't going to m
Am 10.04.2005 um 03:05 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
Do we have any plans to release Naviserver?
IMHO, we still need to resolve nscache, virtual and protocol RFEs but
even without them Naviserver is very and looks much better than AS
already.
Not that i am competing but i am switching to NS whenever
Do we have any plans to release Naviserver?
IMHO, we still need to resolve nscache, virtual and protocol RFEs but
even without them Naviserver is very and looks much better than AS already.
Not that i am competing but i am switching to NS whenever possible
already and what can be better proof t
