Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-17 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 09:53:21 -0500, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > /usr/local/ns/ ... > > bin > > include > > lib > > log > > man > > modules > > sample-config.tcl > > servers > > > > Can we move "tcl" from modules/ to the top, ussually modules are > empty directory w

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-08 Thread Bernd Eidenschink
> Then nscgi - usefull, nsco - usefull, nsperm - ???, nsext - ??? seems there is a constant interest in nscgi, at least it was talked about a lot of times in the aol-mailinglist. > Not much to have working server, some DB modules should be there, at > least PG, MySQL, SQLite, > thi is the main s

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-08 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I think it would be very difficult to come up with a standard set of these higher-level features that would please everyone. I'd like to see lot of extra modules in cvs though. Yes, in CVS, packaging is another issue but having module sin CVS and be able to download them from one place is w

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Deasey
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:17:06 -0500, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Do you have any roadmap-kind of plans or thoughts about naviserver? > Slowly it is getting to the point when it can replace all my patched > aolservers, i already use it at home instead of AS. As i remember

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Stephen Deasey
Sounds like a packaging problem to me. Bundling modules into the core will only turn it into a development/release problem. Large projects actually seem to be going the other way: Postgres are moving things out of core and onto gborg; X.org is busy splitting up into server, fonts, utils, etc.

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Vlad Seryakov
- using -b 0.0.0.0 will listen on all interfaces I'm afraid this is still not clear to me, but I'll have to give you some examples why this is making me trouble. I will prepare the switch to naviserver in our development branch in couple of days and then this will be clear More correct sol

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Monday 07 March 2005 17:19, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > - using -b 0.0.0.0 will listen on all interfaces I'm afraid this is still not clear to me, but I'll have to give you some examples why this is making me trouble. I will prepare the switch to naviserver in our development branch in couple of day

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Vlad Seryakov
- using -b 0.0.0.0 will listen on all interfaces - watchdog has green light for commit - there are always other tiny things :-))) Zoran Vasiljevic wrote: On Monday 07 March 2005 15:55, Vlad Seryakov wrote: I don't, yet. My primary goal is to get to a point where we can switch to naviserver in

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Monday 07 March 2005 15:55, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > > > > > I don't, yet. My primary goal is to get to a point where we can > > switch to naviserver internally. I'm still not there, so for me > > there is more work to do. > > Can you tell what do you still need? On the top of my head: o. b

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Yes, contrib directory is a good idea Bernd Eidenschink wrote: Hi Vlad, I have no idea. We are using the server with our own templating framework based on tDOM but I do not think this is something of general interest. I have light-weight templating i can extract and put into modules/tcl, th

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Bernd Eidenschink
Hi Vlad, > > I have no idea. We are using the server with our own templating > > framework based on tDOM but I do not think this is something > > of general interest. > > I have light-weight templating i can extract and put into modules/tcl, > that will be one small file and will support OACS-styl

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Vlad Seryakov
I don't, yet. My primary goal is to get to a point where we can switch to naviserver internally. I'm still not there, so for me there is more work to do. Can you tell what do you still need? I have no idea. We are using the server with our own templating framework based on tDOM but I do not

Re: [naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-07 Thread Zoran Vasiljevic
On Monday 07 March 2005 00:17, Vlad Seryakov wrote: > Hi guys, > > Do you have any roadmap-kind of plans or thoughts about naviserver? I don't, yet. My primary goal is to get to a point where we can switch to naviserver internally. I'm still not there, so for me there is more work to do. > Slowl

[naviserver-devel] Roadmap

2005-03-06 Thread Vlad Seryakov
Hi guys, Do you have any roadmap-kind of plans or thoughts about naviserver? Slowly it is getting to the point when it can replace all my patched aolservers, i already use it at home instead of AS. As i remember, the initial goal was to patch AS with all out modifications so we start using it