Stephen Deasey schrieb:
>> .
>>
>> Do you have details? Most of these sound more like bugs or accidental
>> changes. Don't work around bugs... :-)
>>
from my referenced posting:
> The argument passing for filters is different in naviserver, in
addition, the useless conn arguments are remov
On 8/10/07, Gustaf Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zoran Vasiljevic schrieb:
> > Yet, so far I do not know anybody who tried to replace
> > the AS with our code. Whatever, we would help you get
> > it up and running if you like. Perhaps this is a good chance
> > to start something like a compa
On 8/9/07, Jeff Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a simple, concise, and comprehensive[*] list of specific
> incompatibilities between the current versions of ns and aolserver?
> I'm considering moving my aolserver code to naviserver, I want to know
> what pitfalls I can expect.
>
> Than
Zoran Vasiljevic schrieb:
> Yet, so far I do not know anybody who tried to replace
> the AS with our code. Whatever, we would help you get
> it up and running if you like. Perhaps this is a good chance
> to start something like a compatibility-list.
>
For naviserver 4.99.1, the following changes
Am 09.08.2007 um 23:04 schrieb Jeff Rogers:
> Is there a simple, concise, and comprehensive[*] list of specific
> incompatibilities between the current versions of ns and aolserver?
> I'm considering moving my aolserver code to naviserver, I want to know
> what pitfalls I can expect.
There is no
Is there a simple, concise, and comprehensive[*] list of specific
incompatibilities between the current versions of ns and aolserver?
I'm considering moving my aolserver code to naviserver, I want to know
what pitfalls I can expect.
Thanks,
-J
[*] - irony intentional :)
---
