On 5/3/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 03.05.2006, at 20:56, Stephen Deasey wrote:
>
> Can you write a test that fails?
This is a very good question I do not know.
Well, give it a shot then. :-)
The bug is fixed when the test stops failing.
I know the app breaks w
On 03.05.2006, at 20:56, Stephen Deasey wrote:
Can you write a test that fails?
This is a very good question I do not know.
I know the app breaks which worked with older + newer
cache code up to that version... I do not do anything
really weird there... just ns_cache_eval.
What is the ch
On 5/1/06, Zoran Vasiljevic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
zvpb:~/sf/naviserver/nsd zoran$ diff -u cache.c.1.7 cache.c.1.8
--- cache.c.1.7 2006-05-01 10:07:00.0 +0200
+++ cache.c.1.8 2006-04-19 18:21:18.0 +0200
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#include "nsd.h"
-NS_RCSID("@(#) $Header: /cvsroot/navis
zvpb:~/sf/naviserver/nsd zoran$ diff -u cache.c.1.7 cache.c.1.8
--- cache.c.1.7 2006-05-01 10:07:00.0 +0200
+++ cache.c.1.8 2006-04-19 18:21:18.0 +0200
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
#include "nsd.h"
-NS_RCSID("@(#) $Header: /cvsroot/naviserver/naviserver/nsd/cache.c,v
1.7 2006/04/15 21:14:57