On 24.10.2007, at 23:41, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> But perhaps it could become something like this:
>
>
> struct {
> int enabled; /* default disabled */
> ...
> } config;
>
> Ns_ModuleInit(char *server, char *module)
> {
> int def = 0;
>
> if (Cfg_Get
On 24.10.2007, at 23:41, Stephen Deasey wrote:
> The basic idea of a callback seem to fit fairly naturaly to how the
> code currently works. And I like the idea more than a hard dependency
> on some DBM library.
>
> I also like the idea that it serves two functions: it's a hook which
> can be use
On 10/23/07, Vasiljevic Zoran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What we haven't figured out is: how the changed
> params are saved (made persistent) when a change
> occurs? This is by no means trivial to do.
> Perhaps the easiest would be to have some kind of
> dbm-like storage (qdbm is nice and LGPL)
