Right
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Am 05.04.2006 um 22:55 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
for now only Ns_SockWait should be replaced in 2 places with
Ns_SockTimedWait in ssl.c
Well, we could get a Ns_SockWait back instead of
getting in the entire module? Wouldn't that be
simpler?
Cheers
Zoran
---
Am 05.04.2006 um 22:55 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
for now only Ns_SockWait should be replaced in 2 places with
Ns_SockTimedWait in ssl.c
Well, we could get a Ns_SockWait back instead of
getting in the entire module? Wouldn't that be
simpler?
Cheers
Zoran
for now only Ns_SockWait should be replaced in 2 places with
Ns_SockTimedWait in ssl.c
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Am 05.04.2006 um 21:52 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
Another problem i had to resolve today, openssl need hacking now to be
able to compile and use it under Naviserver. Do we want to fork
Am 05.04.2006 um 21:52 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
Another problem i had to resolve today, openssl need hacking now to
be able to compile and use it under Naviserver. Do we want to fork
it and maintain in our repository?
It would be interesting to know what hacking it needs
as this may also appl
Another problem i had to resolve today, openssl need hacking now to be
able to compile and use it under Naviserver. Do we want to fork it and
maintain in our repository?
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
