You can do this, and you have access to OSX, i do not
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
Am 04.04.2005 um 17:28 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached
implementation.
Great! Would you put this in or shoud I do it?
I have access to 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 Mac OSX
Am 05.04.2005 um 23:27 schrieb Stephen Deasey:
Should we be concerned about that last comment (Some error was
detected...)?
Hm... to answer that I'd have to read the stuff more carefully :-)
Maybe also look in the gnu implementation and compare the two.
Zoran
On Apr 4, 2005 8:28 AM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached implementation.
>
> Stephen Deasey wrote:
> > I think OSX is the only poll() underachiever we care about.
> > Sourceforge has 10.1 and 10.2 hosts you can compile and test o
Am 04.04.2005 um 17:28 schrieb Vlad Seryakov:
I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached
implementation.
Great! Would you put this in or shoud I do it?
I have access to 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4 Mac OSX (this is one of the most
important
platform for us, btw)...
Thanks you for find
I think it is safe for us to replace NS poll with attached implementation.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
I think OSX is the only poll() underachiever we care about.
Sourceforge has 10.1 and 10.2 hosts you can compile and test on, if
you're interested:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?doci
I think OSX is the only poll() underachiever we care about.
Sourceforge has 10.1 and 10.2 hosts you can compile and test on, if
you're interested:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=762&group_id=1
On Apr 3, 2005 4:44 PM, Vlad Seryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found this,
I found this, looks like we can use it.
i made a copy, so if evrybody is okay i can replace this poll.
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2001-October/069168.html
--
Vlad Seryakov
571 262-8608 office
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crystalballinc.com/vlad/
