Ok, this must be something weird about my build. I'll ignore it for now.
Thanks
-J
Gustaf Neumann wrote:
> Jeff, are you sure, you are setting the parameter correctly in you
> config file? It seems to work for me (Linux FC 17).
>
> clone(child_stack=0x7f912f2b6fb0,
> flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLO
Jeff, are you sure, you are setting the parameter correctly in you
config file? It seems to work for me (Linux FC 17).
clone(child_stack=0x7f912f2b6fb0,
flags=CLONE_VM|CLONE_FS|CLONE_FILES|CLONE_SIGHAND|CLONE_THREAD|CLONE_SYSVSEM|CLONE_SETTLS|CLONE_PARENT_SETTID|CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID,
parent_tid
Hi all,
I've been trying to track down why my naviserver processes have such a
large memory footprint compared to similarly configured aolserver
processes. One culprit I already found is the pre-allocation of
per-conn compression streams (the fixes to this have already been
mentioned, tho not
