On 25.09.21 18:10, Maksym Zinchenko wrote:
Hello everyone, 2 latest commits are not letting me start naviserver.
sorry for the omission. tip version should be fixed now. I'll be back in
Vienna on monday in case i have overseen something... -g
___
n
On 8/2/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Zoran, just to make sure I got that right: xotcl does not work with the
> >> nstrace/lazyloader at all (true or false). That's the reason I'm using
> >> the modified init.tcl file from 4.99.1.
> >
> > I wonder if this is xotcl specific,
>> Zoran, just to make sure I got that right: xotcl does not work with the
>> nstrace/lazyloader at all (true or false). That's the reason I'm using
>> the modified init.tcl file from 4.99.1.
>
> I wonder if this is xotcl specific, or if xotcl just tickles the right
> (wrong) bit of code. Xotcl se
On 8/2/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> > Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> >
> >> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
> >> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
> >> it
Am 02.08.2007 um 20:27 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> Zoran, just to make sure I got that right: xotcl does not work with
> the
> nstrace/lazyloader at all (true or false). That's the reason I'm using
> the modified init.tcl file from 4.99.1.
>
Yes. The Xotcl loader might have some problems.
B
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
>
>> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
>> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
>> it should be fine for now.
>
> Hey... the Xotcl loader MIGHT be busted
Am 02.08.2007 um 19:05 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> Having said this, if Zoran comes up with a generic solution to the
> nstrace+xotcl problem I will be an even happier NS user :) but I guess
> it should be fine for now.
Hey... the Xotcl loader MIGHT be busted with lazyloader option set.
I wou
Stephen Deasey wrote:
> On 8/1/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * For lazyloader=false, initialization seems ok but on first request I
>> get the usual problems mentioned in a previous thread (I had tried once
>> to debug those errors but it took me ages and it did not work out
On 8/1/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * For lazyloader=false, initialization seems ok but on first request I
> get the usual problems mentioned in a previous thread (I had tried once
> to debug those errors but it took me ages and it did not work out in the
> end).
Can you
On 8/1/07, Neophytos Demetriou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have thus removed nstrace.tcl and modified init.tcl from 4.99.1 by
> adding the following snippet in the end of the file:
>
> ns_ictl trace allocate ns_init
> ns_ictl trace deallocate ns_cleanup
>
> It seems to be working ok.
The pro
Zoran, thank you very much for your message.
Zoran Vasiljevic wrote:
> I would not go
> in much detail there as I think that even that is a UGLY
> solution (rather complicated and error-prone, although with some
> nice side-effects regarding memory footprints...).
I would be happy if nstrace was
Am 01.08.2007 um 09:57 schrieb Neophytos Demetriou:
> I would prefer mostly if NS was distributed with an alternative
> init.tcl (based on the 4.99.1) so that it works for all of us. We
> would
> then just change the initfile parameter.
Ah... as I said, the interp inits are really ugly.
The
Stephen Deasey wrote:
> You're using cvs HEAD, right? (Last change was 8 days ago).
>
> But you're using nsd/init.tcl from 4.99.1? There's been quite a few
> changes here. I don't think the current version forces you to use
> nstrace. But if there are specific problems with the way
> initialisat
Dear Stephen,
Thank you very much for your message.
Stephen Deasey wrote:
> You're using cvs HEAD, right? (Last change was 8 days ago).
Yes, I'm using CVS HEAD.
I have to head out of the office/town for the next few hours but I plan
to work on it again when I'm back. I'll post a reply to your
You're using cvs HEAD, right? (Last change was 8 days ago).
But you're using nsd/init.tcl from 4.99.1? There's been quite a few
changes here. I don't think the current version forces you to use
nstrace. But if there are specific problems with the way
initialisation is happening, let us know.
Th
15 matches
Mail list logo
